Peter Dubovský, «Assyrian downfall through Isaiah’s eyes (2 Kings 15–23): the historiography of representation», Vol. 89 (2008) 1-16
In this article I compared Assyrian expansion as presented in the Bible with that presented in the Assyrian sources. Then I pointed out the problems of the historical events presented in the Bible. Combining these problems with the results of source-criticism I argued that the biblical 'distortion' of the historical events was intentional. The writers probably did it to offer their interpretation of the downfall of Assyria. This presentation and organization of the events can be explained in terms of the historiography of representation. By applying this concept it is possible to explain several textual and historical problems of these chapters.
Assyrian downfall through Isaiah’s eyes (2 Kings 15–23) 11
Assyrian arrogance uses the verbs (Ï€rj and jky) that did not imply the
death penalty (cf. Lev 19,17.20; Is 65,6-7).
Reading these four interpretations in the context of chapters 2 Kgs
15–23 we can reorganize them on four levels.
Level zero: Most of the victims suffered humiliation without really
reflecting upon it, though not without a certain degree of resistance.
The Judahite ambassadors returning dismayed after being unable to
withstand Assyrian propaganda (2 Kgs 18,37) as well as the defeated
and deported nations (2 Kgs 18,11; 19,12) belong to this category.
Level one: According to the Bible the Assyrians ascribe their
victories to themselves and according to the Neo-Assyrian royal
inscriptions to their gods. In both the Neo-Assyrian royal inscriptions
(ARAB II.5, 66) and the Bible (29) the Assyrians were aware that God/god
appointed them to destroy the nations and they accomplished this
mission thoroughly. On this level, Assyria is understood as an instrument
chosen by God to punish the rebellious nations, including Israel.
Level two: The biblical writers attribute a further interpretation to
Hezekiah, the first just king during the Assyrian period. He interprets
the Assyrian invasions and the destruction of the cities as a natural
consequence of idolatry (2 Kgs 19,15-19). However, the siege of
Jerusalem, already purified from its idolatry, remains an unanswered
question. On this level, Assyrian behavior is interpreted as reproaching
and rebuking God. Destroying the nations at will, the Assyrians
stopped being an instrument, hired to fulfill God’s will, and turn into a
terrifying destroyer ruining fearful nations (2 Kgs 19,26).
Level three: Only the prophet Isaiah is able to grasp the depth of the
Assyrian problem and offer hope. As an “omniscient narrator†the
prophet Isaiah has access to God’s understanding of the events (30) and
can even grasp the inner feelings of the daughter of Jerusalem. This
literary technique enables us to discover the fatal problems of Assyria.
On this level, Assyria is understood as God’s rival. Because the
invaders attributed their success to themselves, they challenged God’s
suzerainty over history (2 Kgs 19,22-24). By doing this, the Assyrians
turned against the one who hired them and became blasphemers whose
behavior constituted a capital crime.
All the interpretations begin with the same phenomena — the
(29) The concentric structure of Isaiah’s prophecy underlines the concept of
the divine plan according to which the Assyrians were an instrument in God’s
hands, cf. J.D.W. WATTS, Isaiah 34-66 (WBC 25; Nashville, TN 2005) 42.
(30) SKA, “Our Fathersâ€, 44-45.