David J. Armitage, «An Exploration of Conditional Clause Exegesis with Reference to Galatians 1,8-9», Vol. 88 (2007) 365-392
This paper explores various issues pertaining to the exegesis of Greek conditional clauses, using as a case study the pair of conditional statements found in Galatians 1,8-9. These conditional curse formulations are broadly similar with reference to content, whilst also showing significant differences, notably in terms of mood. These conditional statements are firstly examined from syntactic and semantic perspectives. Their function in the discourse is then analysed with reference to Speech Act Theory. An integrative approach to exegesis of conditional clauses is advocated.
An Exploration of Conditional Clause Exegesis 389
clauseâ€, giving as an example a sentence in which the apodosis is so
obviously untrue that the sentence functions as a strong denial (or
negative assertion) of the protasis. This pattern would work for the type
of conditional identified by Nutting as “ground and inference†(137), but
“cause and effect†conditionals, as found in Gal 1,8, can function as a
different type of assertion. A “ground and inference†condition makes
an assertion about the propositional content of the protasis by linking it
to the apodosis in a particular way. When a “cause and effectâ€
condition is used to make an assertion, however, the whole causal
sequence of protasis and apodosis is what is affirmed.
The conditional clause in v. 9 functions differently from that in v. 8.
It is expressed such that it could be more than hypothetical, referring to
specific individuals. It is interesting to consider this clause in the light
of the felicity conditions suggested by Searle for a warning (138), as
shown in Table 5. Paul refers to a situation which may have been
actually happening; he is no longer just talking hypothetically. He
asserts that the consequences of apostate preaching, for those engaging
in it, are of the utmost seriousness, so this statement indirectly
constitutes a warning to such individuals. However Paul is not here
addressing those individuals, but those to whom they are preaching.
Stating the seriousness of the consequences for those who preach a
contrary gospel communicates strongly the idea that following such
individuals cannot be in the best interests of the Galatian believers, so
this also functions as a warning for them.
The sequence of illocutionary acts in Gal 1,6-9 might thus be
approximately represented as shown in Fig. 2.
v. 6 I rebuke you for turning from the one
who called you, to a different gospel
v. 7 I argue that this different gospel can only be a
CLARIFICATION
troubling distortion of the real thing
v. 8 by asserting that for anybody (myself included),
preaching a different gospel leads to the most
severe consequences
v. 9 I warn you that the consequences for those doing this are severe
(= I warn you that following them will certainly not benefit you)
(137) NUTTING, “Modesâ€, 288.
(138) SEARLE, Speech Acts, 67.