Wim J.C. Weren, «The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel: A New Proposal», Vol. 87 (2006) 171-200
The weakness of the proposals concerning the macrostructure of Matthew’s
Gospel made by Bacon and Kingsbury is that they depart from rigid caesuras,
whilst a typical characteristic of the composition of this Gospel is the relatively
smooth flow of the story. On the basis of the discovery that the various
topographical data are clustered together by means of three refrains we can
distinguish three patterns in the travels undertaken by Jesus. This rather coarse
structure is further refined with the use of Matera’s and Carter’s distinction
between kernels and satellites. Kernels are better labelled as “hinge texts”. The
following pericopes belong to this category: 4,12-17; 11,2-30; 16,13-28; 21,1-17;
26,1-16. Each of them marks a turning point in the plot and has a double function:
a hinge text is not only fleshed out in the subsequent pericopes but also refers to
the preceding block. It is especially these “hinge texts” that underline the
continuity of Matthew’s narrative and should prevent us from focussing too much
on alleged caesuras.
194 Wim J.C. Weren
Cristou', a syntagm that is a recapitulation of the stories about Jesus’
deeds in 8,2–9,34. “Hear†and “see†in 11,4 refer back to the Sermon
on the Mount and the series of stories that follow in which Jesus
proves in word and in deed that he really is the Messiah. The recital in
11,5 includes allusions to Isaiah (Isa 29,18-19; 35,5-6; 61,1) but, at the
same time, it is a generalizing reproduction of individual cases that are
described in 8,2–9,34 (32). The concluding beatitude in 11,6 reminds us
of the beatitudes in 5,3-12. In short: in 11,2-6, Jesus gives an evalua-
tive review of his own ministry in answer to a question presented by
John.
In 11,7-19, Jesus in turn asks a question about John, that he
answers himself and that he seizes upon for an evaluative review of the
Baptist’s ministry. The question put three times to the people as to why
they went to the desert (11,7.8.9) refers to 3,5 in combination with 3,1.
John is not a man dressed in fine clothes (11,8), which fits 3,4 where
he is dressed in a cloak made of camel’s hair. Jesus’ description of John
in 11,10 is similar to the way in which John is presented in 3,3 by the
narrator (in each case: ou|tov" ejstin, followed by a quotation from the
Scriptures). John’s ministry is the last preparation for the coming of
Jesus. According to 11,10, he comes ahead of Jesus (pro; proswvpou
sou and emprosqen sou); this corresponds with 3,11 in which it is said
[ v
of Jesus that he will come after John (ojpivsw mou). The past is further
structured in 11,12-13. In these verses, an attempt is made to
differentiate between prediction and fulfilment. The period of fulfil-
ment has begun with the coming of John. Characteristic of this period
is that the kingdom has a hard time of it (biavzetai has a passive
meaning: “suffer violenceâ€) and that adversaries (biastai; has a
negative connotation) try to prevent its growth. The contemporaries of
Jesus and John also react in a negative way towards them (11,16-19).
Matt 11,20-24 also reviews the events told earlier. That Jesus’
powerful deeds in the towns did not lead to conversion relates to the
stories about his deeds in 8,2–9,34 and to his call for conversion in
4,17. Capernaum, Jesus’ own town (cf. 4,13; 8,5; 9,1), will bear the
brunt.
Anticipating elements are to be found in particular in 11,25-30.
The time adjunct ejn ejkeivnw/ tw/' kairw/' is mentioned in 11,25 for the first
(32) “The blind receive their sightâ€: cf. 9,27-31; “the lame walkâ€: cf. 9,2-8;
“the lepers are cleansedâ€: cf. 8,2-4; “the deaf hearâ€: cf. 9,32-34, where a mute
begins to speak; “the dead are raised†cf. 9,18-19.23-26; “the good news is
brought to the poorâ€; cf. “the poor†in 5,3 and “the good news†in 4,23 and 9,35.