Wim J.C. Weren, «The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel: A New Proposal», Vol. 87 (2006) 171-200
The weakness of the proposals concerning the macrostructure of Matthew’s
Gospel made by Bacon and Kingsbury is that they depart from rigid caesuras,
whilst a typical characteristic of the composition of this Gospel is the relatively
smooth flow of the story. On the basis of the discovery that the various
topographical data are clustered together by means of three refrains we can
distinguish three patterns in the travels undertaken by Jesus. This rather coarse
structure is further refined with the use of Matera’s and Carter’s distinction
between kernels and satellites. Kernels are better labelled as “hinge texts”. The
following pericopes belong to this category: 4,12-17; 11,2-30; 16,13-28; 21,1-17;
26,1-16. Each of them marks a turning point in the plot and has a double function:
a hinge text is not only fleshed out in the subsequent pericopes but also refers to
the preceding block. It is especially these “hinge texts” that underline the
continuity of Matthew’s narrative and should prevent us from focussing too much
on alleged caesuras.
The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel 197
unity of place, because the adjuncts of place in 21,1.10.12.17 are a
continuation of one another that together create the impression of
continuous movement. In the first nine verses, Jesus is in the vicinity
of Jerusalem, in 21,10 he enters the city, in 21,12 he enters the temple
and in 21,17 he leaves the city.
As Jesus reaches his destination in 21,1-17, we could consider this
passage to be part of the preceding text. However, because on arrival
he immediately undertakes a number of controversial actions in the
temple, thus becoming involved in a short debate with the chief priest
and scribes, who cross his path again later, we can also consider this
passage as an introduction to the sequel. The connection with the
preceding block is also clear from the indication of Jesus as the Son of
David (in 20,30-31 as well as 21,9). The crowd mentioned in 21,8-10
are not inhabitants of Jerusalem but people who have travelled with
Jesus to Jerusalem. They announce to the “whole city†that the man
entering Jerusalem is a prophet, that his name is Jesus, and that he
comes from Nazareth in Galilee. All this is information from earlier
passages in the book. The places named, “the Mount of Olivesâ€, “the
templeâ€, and “Bethanyâ€, show a connection with the sequel; all these
locations, entered for the first time in 21,1-17, recur in subsequent
passages. In view of all these connections with the preceding text and
what follows, we can again typify this passage as a hinge text.
After his arrival in Jerusalem, Jesus continues with the work he
had been doing up till then: he heals the sick, debates with his
adversaries and instructs his disciples. This is clearly expressed in the
discourse he holds on the Mount of Olives (cf. “the mountain†in 5,1),
in the presence of his disciples. In the sequence on Jesus’ activities in
the city, we can discern a clear structure:
21,18–25,46 Jesus is active in Jerusalem
A 21,18-22 A fig tree withers
B 21,23–23,39 Debates with adversaries in the temple
A’ 24,1-2 The temple shall be destroyed
C 24,3–25,46 Discourse: the coming of the Son of Man
Some explanation is necessary here. The whole block
(21,18–25,46) takes place — just as 21,1-17 — on one day (see 21,18;
22,23.46). It is the day after the entry into Jerusalem that is largely
taken up with debates in the temple (21,23; 24,1). This lengthy part is
framed by 21,18-22 and 24,1-2. The link between these short scenes
can be explained as follows. In 21,18-22, Jesus, who is on his way