Wim J.C. Weren, «The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel: A New Proposal», Vol. 87 (2006) 171-200
The weakness of the proposals concerning the macrostructure of Matthew’s
Gospel made by Bacon and Kingsbury is that they depart from rigid caesuras,
whilst a typical characteristic of the composition of this Gospel is the relatively
smooth flow of the story. On the basis of the discovery that the various
topographical data are clustered together by means of three refrains we can
distinguish three patterns in the travels undertaken by Jesus. This rather coarse
structure is further refined with the use of Matera’s and Carter’s distinction
between kernels and satellites. Kernels are better labelled as “hinge texts”. The
following pericopes belong to this category: 4,12-17; 11,2-30; 16,13-28; 21,1-17;
26,1-16. Each of them marks a turning point in the plot and has a double function:
a hinge text is not only fleshed out in the subsequent pericopes but also refers to
the preceding block. It is especially these “hinge texts” that underline the
continuity of Matthew’s narrative and should prevent us from focussing too much
on alleged caesuras.
198 Wim J.C. Weren
from Bethany to the temple, causes a fig tree to wither in the presence
of his disciples. The tree is full of leaves but carries no fruit. The fig
tree is an image of the temple (cf. the cleansing of the temple in 21,12-
13 and the announcement of the destruction of the temple complex in
24,1-2).
Jesus culminates his activities in Jerusalem with the Eschatolo-
gical Discourse. This takes place on the Mount of Olives, opposite the
temple. The discourse is directed at his disciples and is about the long
period between Jesus’ resurrection and his parousia.
*
**
The last step in my search is to combine the results in a scheme
that renders a clear view of the macrostructure of Matthew, the various
parts of which I will provide with headings. The result is printed at the
end of this article.
What is new about this hypothesis is that it provides a layered
image of the structure of Matthew’s Gospel. At the first level, the
structure is still coarse; at the second and third levels, the structure of
the corpus (4,18–25,46) is presented gradually in more detail. What is
also new is the insight that a number of passages function as hinges.
Such a hinge text is linked with both the sequence that precedes it and
the one that follows it. The size of these sequences is relatively large
at the first level. At the second level, they are smaller and, at the third
level, even smaller still.
These two new insights explain why earlier research on the
macrostructure of Matthew has led to such diverse results. Too much
attention has been paid to rigid caesuras, whilst a typical characteristic
of the composition of Matthew is the relatively smooth flow of the
story. The various sections of the book partly overlap. In the hinge
texts, patterns that have already been set are repeatedly continued
whilst, at the same time, new patterns are indicated that are then
further developed.
Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies Wim J.C. WEREN
Tilburg University
P.O. Box 90153
NL-5000 LE Tilburg