Wim J.C. Weren, «The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel: A New Proposal», Vol. 87 (2006) 171-200
The weakness of the proposals concerning the macrostructure of Matthew’s
Gospel made by Bacon and Kingsbury is that they depart from rigid caesuras,
whilst a typical characteristic of the composition of this Gospel is the relatively
smooth flow of the story. On the basis of the discovery that the various
topographical data are clustered together by means of three refrains we can
distinguish three patterns in the travels undertaken by Jesus. This rather coarse
structure is further refined with the use of Matera’s and Carter’s distinction
between kernels and satellites. Kernels are better labelled as “hinge texts”. The
following pericopes belong to this category: 4,12-17; 11,2-30; 16,13-28; 21,1-17;
26,1-16. Each of them marks a turning point in the plot and has a double function:
a hinge text is not only fleshed out in the subsequent pericopes but also refers to
the preceding block. It is especially these “hinge texts” that underline the
continuity of Matthew’s narrative and should prevent us from focussing too much
on alleged caesuras.
The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel 195
time and is repeated in 12,1 and 14,1. That God is the origin of the
revelation is confirmed in 16,17. Most important is that, in 11,25-27,
there is for the first time a split between those who are impervious to
the revelation, and those who are receptive to it. This distinction
dominates the chapters to follow, where an explanation is given (e.g.
13,10-17).
The interim balance in 11,2-30 is followed by a lengthy sequence
(12,1–16,12), in which the moves of Jesus form a repeatedly recurring
refrain (12,15; 14,13; 15,21). In 4,18–11,1, he was especially active in
the towns of Galilee (cf. the adjuncts of place in 4,23; 9,35; 11,1),
whereas now he spends more and more of his time in uninhabited
areas (33).
Already in the first reading, it is apparent that the Parable
Discourse is an individual subunit within this lengthy sequence
(marked as such by the narrator in 13,53a). This discourse is flanked
on two sides by narrative blocks (12,1-50 and 14,1–16,12), both of
which start with ejn ejkeivnw/ tw/' kairw/' and which also show many other
similarities: Jesus is forced to move due to his increasing conflicts with
the Pharisees (mentioned in 12,2.14.24.38 and in 15,1.12; 16,1.6.11-
12), whom he typifies as “a wicked and adulterous generationâ€
(12,39.45 and 16,4). He is disturbed by their words (12,25-45), their
traditions (15,1-20), and their teaching (16,1-12), and, at their request
for a sign, he refers to the sign of Jonah (12,38-39 and 16,1-4); despite
the opposition he tirelessly continues to heal the sick (12,9-14.15.22
and 14,14.35-36; 15,21-28.30-31).
That 14,1–16,12 is a coherent subunit is supported by three
arguments: a) this section is strongly dominated by words that are
related to food (34); b) in this part, frequent mention is made of the
crossing of the lake (14,13.22-34; 15,39; 16,5); c) there are two
retrospections at the end of 16,1-12: 16,9 refers back to the feeding of
the five thousand in 14,13-21, and 16,10 to the feeding of the four
thousand in 15,29-39.
The sequence thus defined has a concentric structure. Its heart is
the Parable Sermon (C), which is surrounded by two short scenes (B:
12,46-50; B’: 13,53-58), that have in common that Jesus’ mother and
(33) I.e. 12,1: through the grain fields; 12,15: to an unidentified place; 14,13:
to a deserted place; 14,23: up the mountain; 14,25ff: on the sea; 15,29: along the
Sea of Galilee ... up the mountain (= in the desert, cf. 15,33).
(34) Such words are of course unavoidable in the two feeding narratives
(14,13-21; 15,29-39), but they can also be found in 15,1-20; 15,21-28; 16,1-12.