Wim J.C. Weren, «The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel: A New Proposal», Vol. 87 (2006) 171-200
The weakness of the proposals concerning the macrostructure of Matthew’s
Gospel made by Bacon and Kingsbury is that they depart from rigid caesuras,
whilst a typical characteristic of the composition of this Gospel is the relatively
smooth flow of the story. On the basis of the discovery that the various
topographical data are clustered together by means of three refrains we can
distinguish three patterns in the travels undertaken by Jesus. This rather coarse
structure is further refined with the use of Matera’s and Carter’s distinction
between kernels and satellites. Kernels are better labelled as “hinge texts”. The
following pericopes belong to this category: 4,12-17; 11,2-30; 16,13-28; 21,1-17;
26,1-16. Each of them marks a turning point in the plot and has a double function:
a hinge text is not only fleshed out in the subsequent pericopes but also refers to
the preceding block. It is especially these “hinge texts” that underline the
continuity of Matthew’s narrative and should prevent us from focussing too much
on alleged caesuras.
184 Wim J.C. Weren
4,12 Now when Jesus heard that John had been arrested, he withdrew
(anecwrhsen) to Galilee.
j v
12,15 When Jesus became aware of this, he departed (ajnecwvrhsen).
14,13 Now when Jesus heard this, he withdrew (ajnecwvrhsen) from there in a
boat to a deserted place by himself.
15,21 Jesus left that place and went away (ajnecwvrhsen) to the district of Tyre
and Sidon.
That these sentences have the character of a refrain is clear from
the fact that, apart from the verb ajnacwrevw, they also have a number
of other fixed elements: a) people close to Jesus or Jesus himself
withdraw(s); b) they do this because they hear or perceive that Jesus is
being threatened by his adversaries; c) this withdrawal brings him to a
new location that is usually named explicitly; d) in four cases, the
refrain is accompanied by a fulfilment quotation (2,15.23; 4,14-16;
12,18-21).
The whole series shows a certain amount of progression. Initially,
the wise men and Joseph are the subject of ajnacwrevw (2,12-13.14.22)
but, from 4,12 onwards, this action is completed by Jesus himself. His
life is threatened firstly by the local political leaders, Herod the Great
(2,12-13.14) and his sons Archelaus (2,22) and Antipas (4,12; 14,13),
but further on in the book, his circle of enemies is expanded with the
Pharisees (12,14; 15,21), who are plotting his death. Progression can
also be observed in the fact that Galilee, a region where initially Jesus
is still safe (2,22; 4,12), is gradually becoming a hazardous area, as a
result of which Jesus begins to avoid towns and villages, staying in
uninhabited areas (14,13), and even venturing in the direction of the
district of Tyre and Sidon, places inhabited by the gentiles (15,31).
Having turned his back on the Pharisees and the Sadduccees (16,4), he
leaves for the region of Caesarea Philippi. These moves have the
remarkable effect of increasing Jesus’ radius of action: in fact, he
meets large crowds even in uninhabited areas, and, although he knows
that he has been sent only for the lost sheep of the house of Israel
(15,24), he relents to a woman from the world of the gentiles and has
mercy on her, too.
The fulfilment quotations connected to this refrain make it clear
that Jesus’ wanderings take place according to a certain plan and that
they have already been announced in texts of the Scripture that are
presented by the narrator as God’s own words. Thus, Jesus does not
travel so restlessly through fear of his enemies, but in obedience to
God.
The refrain discussed focuses the attention on the constant that
Jesus distances himself from Jerusalem and Judea, his native soil. This