Jerome H. Neyrey, «"First", "Only", "One of a Few", and "No One Else". The Rhetoric of Uniqueness and the Doxologies in 1 Timothy», Vol. 86 (2005) 59-87
The distinctive way of honoring gods or God was to celebrate
what is unique about them, that is, praise of persons who were the "first",
"only", or "one of a few" to do something. Rhetoric from Aristotle to Quintilian
expounded the theory of "uniqueness", which the authors of Greek hymns and
prayers employed. One finds a Semitic counterpart in the "principle of
incomparability" describing Israelite kings. "Uniqueness" pervades the New
Testament, especially its doxologies. In them, "uniqueness" was richly expressed
in rhetorical mode, as well as by predicates of negative theology which elevated
the deity above those praising.
80 Jerome H. Neyrey
Hellenistic expression, we have seen, emerges in the philosophical
refinement of the concept of god. But there is no question that the
infinity of God expressed by the doxologies speaks to God’s
uniqueness, for no one else can boast of such timelessness. God is
the only one who by virtue of God’s person will continue to exist
forever.
b) The Doxology in 1 Tim 6,15-16
This second doxology contains an elaborate structure and a rich
series of names, titles and predicates, which deserve extended
comment.
(1) Makavrio". Kelly argues that this attribute of God is “common
in Hellenistic Judaism†(68); Hauck rightly notes that “God is not called
makario" in the Bibleâ€, with the exception of 1 Tim 1,11 and 6,15, the
v
texts under discussion here (69). Moreover since we saw in the Greek
Orphic hymns that most of the gods there were acclaimed “blessedâ€,
we find considerable evidence which indicates that makavrio" was a
common attribute of Greco-Roman gods and now of the Christian
God. “Blessedness†constitutes a recurring theme in Philo’s discussion
of God. For example,
But the nature of God is without grief (a[lupo") or fear (a[fobo"), and
wholly exempt (ajmevtoco") from passion of any kind, and alone (movnh)
partakes of perfect happiness (makariovthto" pantelou'") and blissâ€
(Abr. 202).
This and many more statements found in Philo derive from a
philosophical tradition which talked about God in negative predicates
and acclaimed God’s unique blessedness (70). Moreover, Epicureans
argued that god must be both makavrio" and a[fqarto": “A blessed
(makarion) and eternal (a[fqarton) being has no trouble himself and
v
brings no trouble upon other beings†(71). Uniqueness is contained in
the attribute “blessedâ€, in that it distinguishes god from mortals who
(68) J.N.D. KELLY, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles (New York
1963) 46.
(69) F. HAUCK, “makavrio"â€, TDNT IV, 363.
(70) For example, “Separate, my soul, all that is created, mortal, mutable,
profane from thy conception of God the uncreated (ajgenhvtou), unchangeable
(ajtrevptou), the immortal (ajfqavrtou), the holy and solely blessed (movnou
makariou)†(Sacr. 101); see also Sacr. 95; Somn. 1.95; Sp. Leg. 1.329.
v
(71) See also Cicero, Nature of the Gods 1.45-49, 68, 85, 106-107; 3.3. Yet
P.H. TOWNER (1 and 2 Timothy and Titus [Downers Grove, IL 1994] 146) asserts
that “blessed ... only†comes out of intertestamental Judaism.