John Burnight, «Does Eliphaz Really Begin 'Gently'? An Intertextual Reading of Job 4,2-11», Vol. 95 (2014) 347-370
It is widely believed that the Joban poet presents Eliphaz as seeking to reassure Job in his first speech, and only later accuses him of wrongdoing. One prominent exegete, for example, remarks that Eliphaz 'begins considerately, and proceeds with notable gentleness and courtesy' (Terrien). In this paper I propose that Eliphaz’s opening words are neither gentle nor reassuring. Instead, they are a sharp intertextual response to Job’s complaints that he can find no 'rest' (3,26) and that what he 'feared has come upon him' (3,25). In essence, Eliphaz is implying that Job has brought his suffering on himself.
02_Burnight-co_347_370 28/10/14 10:35 Pagina 352
352 JOHN BURNIGHT
and the Vulgate as docuisti (“teach, tell, show”). Rabbinic authorities
such as Rashi and Ralbag also viewed Eliphaz as rebuking Job here 12.
An intertextual reading of the next three cola also indicates that
Eliphaz is not encouraging Job, but rather setting up an accusation
of double standards in 4,5. Just as 4,2 was a response to Job’s com-
plaint of a lack of “rest” in 3,26, so 4,3-4 can be viewed as an in-
tertextual response to Job’s expression of “fear” and “dread” in 3,25
(“For what I fear comes upon me, and what I dread befalls me”).
The metaphors of “feeble hands” and “weak knees”, though gen-
erally taken to be Eliphaz’s praise of Job for his past support of the
despondent and unfortunate, are used elsewhere in the biblical cor-
pus to describe symptoms of “fear” or “anxiety”, frequently the ter-
ror felt by those who have experienced God’s wrath 13. Similarly,
forms of lvk (“stumble”) from 4,4a are often used in prophetic lit-
erature as a metaphor for sinners facing divine punishment 14. The
fact that Eliphaz uses imagery associated with the fear of divine
judgment suggests that he is citing Job’s past attitude to those being
punished by God, rather than cataloging his general kindness and
piety. Since Eliphaz goes on to state, “But now it has come to you
[...]” in the next verse, the implication is clear: he views Job’s suf-
fering as divine punishment.
Even those who believe that Eliphaz affirms Job’s righteousness
in his opening speech often acknowledge that 4,5 exhibits a sharp
tone. Strahan, for example, writes that in this verse Eliphaz “very
distinctly strikes the wrong notes of blame and reproof” 15. But this
verse’s accusatory tone is not a “wrong note” in an otherwise sym-
pathetic discourse if Eliphaz’s intention from the very beginning is
to critique Job, rather than to praise him. If 4,2 is a response to the
idea of “exhaustion” in 3,26, and 4,3-4 to Job’s expression of “fear”
and “dread” in 3,25, then 4,5 has semantic links to both of these
themes: Eliphaz cites Job’s “exhaustion” — again using a form of
12
Mikra’ot Gedolot Sefer Iyov, 14-16.
13
For “weak hands” and/or “feeble knees” as metaphors for fear, cf. e.g.,
2 Sam 4,1; Ezra 4,4; Neh 6,9; Isa 13,7; 35,3; Jer 6,24; 38,4; 47,3; 50,43; Ezek
7,17; 21,7; Zeph 3,16. The phrase “strengthen weak hands” is used to indicate
an exhortation to courage; e.g., 1 Sam 23,16; Ezra 6,22; Isa 41,13; Ezek 13,22.
14
Cf. Isa 3,8; 8,15; 28,13; 59,14; Jer 6,15.21; 8,12; 18,23; 20,11; 46,6.16;
Hos 4,5; 5,5; 14,1.9; Lam 1,14.
15
STRAHAN, The Book of Job Interpreted, 60-61.