Morten Hørning Jensen, «Rural Galilee and Rapid Changes: An Investigation of the Socio-Economic Dynamics and Developments in Roman Galilee», Vol. 93 (2012) 43-67
Much research on the socio-economic conditions of Galilee in the Herodian period has argued for a rapid economic deterioration amongst the rural population. This is said to have resulted in a deadly spiral of violence prompting popular protest movements of which Jesus of Nazareth became the most renowned. Other investigations, however, paint a much more lenient picture of Galilee being under only a moderate development. This article outlines the problem at hand in the research, suggests a methodology for further development and applies this to new archaeological material emerging from excavations in Galilee and the textual material available.
55
RURAL GALILEE AND RAPID CHANGES
To conclude this “survey of surveysâ€, the following may be
noted: In all the surveys presented here, there is an unambiguous
trend of growth in the settlement density in Galilee and other Jewish
regions from the Hellenistic period and onwards until at least the
late Roman period. There is no sign of decline in the first century.
It is important, however, to realize that the results of surveys
should be treated with caution due to their broad time spans. They
need to be complemented by proper stratified excavations, to which
we will turn shortly.
3. Land Ownership
Connected to the issue of settlement patterns is the issue of land
ownership, a highly contested topic in Galilean research.
Some claim that from the time of Alexander the Great and
onwards, more and more land was aggregated under the crown.
Large estates, latifundiae, were on the rise, farmed by a mix of day
laborers, small-plot owners and even slaves, but owned by the tiny
segment of rich elite living remotely in an urban setting as
“absentee landlords†38. Recently, John Kloppenborg has forcefully
argued for this picture in his study, The Tenants in the Vineyard 39.
Others emphasize that the tension between the rich urban elite
and the rural peasantry was a fact of life long before Alexander, as
indicated by several pre-Hellenistic traditions 40, and that the sources
do not paint a dramatically different picture of this balance during
the Herodian period. In particular, it has been a trend in recent
research on Herod the Great to depict his rule in a more positive light,
stepping back from grand psychological descriptions based on
Josephus’ at times colorful descriptions.
38
Cf. eg. APPLEBAUM, “Economic Lifeâ€; APPLEBAUM, “Roman Provinceâ€;
D.E. OAKMAN, Jesus and the Economic Questions of His Day (Studies in the
Bible and Early Christianity 8; Lewiston, NY 1986) and D.E. OAKMAN, Jesus
and the Peasants (Eugene, OR 2008).
39
J.S. KLOPPENBORG, The Tenants in the Vineyard. Ideology, Economics,
and Agrarian Conflict in Jewish Palestine (WUNT 195; Tübingen 2006).
40
Cf. eg. M. GOODMAN, State and Society in Roman Galilee, A.D. 132-212
(Totowa, NJ 1983) and Z. SAFRAI, The Economy of Roman Palestine (Lon-
don 1994).