Morten Hørning Jensen, «Rural Galilee and Rapid Changes: An Investigation of the Socio-Economic Dynamics and Developments in Roman Galilee», Vol. 93 (2012) 43-67
Much research on the socio-economic conditions of Galilee in the Herodian period has argued for a rapid economic deterioration amongst the rural population. This is said to have resulted in a deadly spiral of violence prompting popular protest movements of which Jesus of Nazareth became the most renowned. Other investigations, however, paint a much more lenient picture of Galilee being under only a moderate development. This article outlines the problem at hand in the research, suggests a methodology for further development and applies this to new archaeological material emerging from excavations in Galilee and the textual material available.
61
RURAL GALILEE AND RAPID CHANGES
show that “the distribution of the Jerusalem-area and non-Jerusalem-
area Herodian lamps was not random†59. At sites known to be largely
Jewish (Jotapata, Gamla and Sepphoris), most of the lamps were
imported from Jerusalem, whereas the same type of lamp found at
Gentile sites (Dora and Scythopolis) were mostly locally produced. A
minor percentage was, however, of Jerusalemite origin. This suggests
two things: The Jewish Galilean population preferred lamps from
Jerusalem despite the extra cost of transportation, and that inter-
regional trade took place to some extent. Thus, this new study
confirms that trade and interaction were conducted between the
various Jewish regions as well as between the Jewish and non-Jewish
regions of the area.
Finally, in this connection, a recent study by Agnes Choi on
pedology and soil distribution can be mentioned. By correlating a
pedological map with material finds in rural excavations, Choi is able
to argue for what she calls “economic rationalismâ€, which encapsulates
how the ancient Galileans to a certain extent cultivated what grew best
on their farming plots and relied on trade and markets in the cities to
supply their other needs. Urban-rural relations were seemingly more
reciprocal than has been argued from time to time 60.
6. Differentiated Houses and Living Units
One further way of measuring the socio-economic climate of rural
Galilee is by considering the scale of domestic units encountered in
rural settings. Do we encounter a poor, unified body of houses or a
diversified picture pointing to social stratification even within the
villages themselves? This would to some degree reveal whether
funds were stored in the villages, or whether these areas were drained
of those funds by absent plantation owners leaving nothing behind
but a uniformly poor body of workers and peasants.
59
D. ADAN-BAYEWITZ et al. (eds.), “Preferential Distribution of Lamps
From the Jerusalem Area in the Late Second Temple Period (Late First Cen-
tury B.C.E.-70 C.E.)â€, BASOR 350 (2008) 77.
60
Cf. A. CHOI, “Choosing a Speciality: An Investigation of Regional Spe-
cialization in Galilee†(paper presented at the annual meeting of the SBL,
Boston 2008). In this Choi utilizes the Central Place Theory of I. Hopkins; cf.
I.W.J. HOPKINS, “The City Region in Roman Palestineâ€, Palestine Explora-
tion Quarterly 113 (1980) 19-32.