Morten Hørning Jensen, «Rural Galilee and Rapid Changes: An Investigation of the Socio-Economic Dynamics and Developments in Roman Galilee», Vol. 93 (2012) 43-67
Much research on the socio-economic conditions of Galilee in the Herodian period has argued for a rapid economic deterioration amongst the rural population. This is said to have resulted in a deadly spiral of violence prompting popular protest movements of which Jesus of Nazareth became the most renowned. Other investigations, however, paint a much more lenient picture of Galilee being under only a moderate development. This article outlines the problem at hand in the research, suggests a methodology for further development and applies this to new archaeological material emerging from excavations in Galilee and the textual material available.
63
RURAL GALILEE AND RAPID CHANGES
Hellenistic, Roman and Byzantine periods. In total, 186 coin
collections were catalogued, resulting in a database of nearly 10,000
identifiable coins.
In essence, Syon’s investigation confirms in great detail what is
also known from local excavation counts, namely that while “a
dramatic change†65 took place during the Hasmonean period, when
Tyrian and Ptolemaic coins were substituted by Hasmonean coinage,
only minor changes took place during the Herodian period. Neither
Herod the Great’s nor Herod Antipas’ coinage made any real impact
on the circulation.
To illustrate, it can be mentioned that while Syon counted 5,632
Hasmonean coins, only 723 coins from Herodian and Romans
rulers were found.
Thus it is a serious exaggeration to claim that the Herodian rulers
profoundly monetized the economy. Rather, they carried forward
what already existed 66.
8. Taxes
Another factor that has often been presented as a background for
the breakdown of the socio-economic stability during the Herodian
regimes is the tax burden. Quite a number of scholars have argued
for the existence of a system of triple taxation in the first century:
imperial, Herodian and temple tax 67.
In a recent dissertation, F. Udoh has surveyed this issue afresh and
arrives through detailed analysis of the textual sources at a different
picture. First, he denies that an imperial tax was ever paid on a regular
65
D. SYON, Tyre and Gamla. A Study in the Monetary Influence of Sout-
hern Phoenicia on Galilee and the Golan in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods
(unpublished PhD dissertation, Jerusalem 2004) 224.
66
A thorough discussion of the coinage of this period can be found in
M.H. JENSEN, “Message and Minting: The Coins of Herod Antipas in Their
Second Temple Context As a Source for Understanding the Religio-Political
and Socio-Economic Dynamics of Early First Century Galileeâ€, Religion,
Ethnicity and Identity in Ancient Galilee (eds. J. ZANGENBERG – H. ATTRIDGE –
D.B. MARTIN) (WUNT 210; Tübingen 2007) 277-314.
67
Cf. e.g. APPLEBAUM, “Roman Provinceâ€, 373 and R.A. HORSLEY, Gali-
lee. History, Politics, People (Valley Forge, PA 1995) 140, 215-217.