Morten Hørning Jensen, «Rural Galilee and Rapid Changes: An Investigation of the Socio-Economic Dynamics and Developments in Roman Galilee», Vol. 93 (2012) 43-67
Much research on the socio-economic conditions of Galilee in the Herodian period has argued for a rapid economic deterioration amongst the rural population. This is said to have resulted in a deadly spiral of violence prompting popular protest movements of which Jesus of Nazareth became the most renowned. Other investigations, however, paint a much more lenient picture of Galilee being under only a moderate development. This article outlines the problem at hand in the research, suggests a methodology for further development and applies this to new archaeological material emerging from excavations in Galilee and the textual material available.
53
RURAL GALILEE AND RAPID CHANGES
of a general increase in the number of settlements in Palestine during
these periods.
Hel. Rom. Byz.
(332-63 BCE) (63 BCE ― 324 CE) (324-641)
Samaria 1993 170 235 306
Samaria 1997, 15.680 22.000 32.520
number of
settlers
Chart 4
The final chart summarizes the most important survey for our
purposes. Over a five year period, Uzi Leibner directed a team that
systematically surveyed an area of 285 square kilometers west of
the north-eastern part of the lake of Galilee with the objective of
describing the developments in settlement density in the Hellenistic
through Byzantine periods (300 BCE ― 650 CE) 33.
The importance of the survey stems from two facts: First, it is
located in the heart of Lower Galilee, and, second, it offers a more
refined picture by establishing what Leibner terms a “high resolution
analysis†with relatively short sub-periods. Leibner thus distinguishes
between an early Roman period lasting until 135 CE, a mid-Roman
period lasting until 250 CE and, finally, a late Roman period (the
Byzantine period is similarly divided into three).
The basis of this “high resolution analysis†is twofold. On the one
hand, Leibner uses David Adan-Bayewitz’s detailed classification of
Galilean pottery types 34, and, on the other hand, the survey managed
to collect a large sample of ceramics from each site; in total an
average of 200, counting only identifiable shards.
Leibner arrived at the following results: In the Hellenistic period,
settlements were “sparse†and, furthermore, proved to be “fortified sites
of Benjamin (Archaeological Survey of Israel; Jerusalem 1993); I. FINKEL-
STEIN – Z. LEDERMAN – S. BUNIMOVITZ, Highlands of Many Cultures. The
Southern Samaria Survey. The Sites (Tel Aviv University Monograph Series
14; Tel Aviv, Israel 1997).
33
Cf. LEIBNER, Settlement. Chart 2 summarizes the numbers given at p.
310 and 314.
34
Cf. D. ADAN-BAYEWITZ, Common Pottery in Roman Galilee. A Study of
Local Trade (Ramat-Gan, Israel 1993).