Morten Hørning Jensen, «Rural Galilee and Rapid Changes: An Investigation of the Socio-Economic Dynamics and Developments in Roman Galilee», Vol. 93 (2012) 43-67
Much research on the socio-economic conditions of Galilee in the Herodian period has argued for a rapid economic deterioration amongst the rural population. This is said to have resulted in a deadly spiral of violence prompting popular protest movements of which Jesus of Nazareth became the most renowned. Other investigations, however, paint a much more lenient picture of Galilee being under only a moderate development. This article outlines the problem at hand in the research, suggests a methodology for further development and applies this to new archaeological material emerging from excavations in Galilee and the textual material available.
46 MORTEN HØRNING JENSEN
always be bad news for the peasants 12. Thus, it is the aim of this
investigation to confirm or to deny the presence of rapid change in
first-century C.E. Galilee.
3. Gauging Galilee’s Socio-Economic Pulse
In order to detect rapid change, we must identify appropriate
gauges or indicators that can provide us with a sense of the socio-
economic pulse of Galilee. The task is to identify as many as possible.
It is simply not convincing to say that, since the Herodian colonial
administration was expanding at exactly the same time as John the
Baptist and Jesus lived, their resistance was most likely a kind of
peasant resistance 13.
A gauge is defined by the ability to reveal a certain aspect of the
socio-economic situation when measured over time. It has two
intrinsic limitations. One is that it is a relative marker geared more
towards detecting changes than describing the situation per se.
Another is its limited scope designed only to describe the situation
from a certain angle. The idea is nevertheless that each indicator will
allow, first, the different types of source material and the different
approaches to speak for themselves, and, second, when combined,
they will provide us with a sense of the socio-economic conditions of
rural first-century Galilee. The gauges to be dealt with are: the political
history of Galilee, the impact of Herod Antipas, land ownership,
settlement patterns, rural villages and living units, monetization,
specialization and commerce, taxes and climate. In each case, the aim
is to trace developments and change over time.
12
Not all would agree to this presupposition. Especially Douglas R. Ed-
wards has, within a Galilean context, argued for the view that enhanced op-
portunities of trade and a market-driven economy would present itself as a
benefit to the peasants as well allowing more trade and interaction see D.R.
EDWARDs, “Identity and Social Location in Roman Galilean Villagesâ€, Reli-
gion, Ethnicity and Identity in Ancient Galilee (eds. J. ZANGENBERG – H.W.
ATTRIDGE – D.B. MARTIN) (Tübingen 2007) 373-374.
13
As often claimed, cf. e.g. R.A. HORSLEY – J.A. DRAPER, Whoever Hears
You Hears Me. Prophets, Performance, and Tradition in Q (Harrisburg, PA
1999) 58-59 and S. FREYNE, Jesus, A Jewish Galilean. A New Reading of the
Jesus-Story (London ‒ New York 2004) 134-139.