Giancarlo Biguzzi, «Witnessing Two by Two in the Acts of the Apostles.», Vol. 92 (2011) 1-20
The program of Act 1,8 is carried through by the Twelve only in Jerusalem, Samaria and the Mediterranean coast, — but not «till the end of the earth». Their witness, however, is prolonged by the Seven of Jerusalem, the Five of Syrian Antioch, and the Seven companions of Paul of Act 20,4. Surprisingly, for everyone of the four groups of witnesses, the author narrates then the witnessing of only two of them. The narrative lacuna, apparently intentional since it recurs four times, allows Luke to involve the reader in reconstructing the spread of the gospel in all the directions for the remaining ten twelfths.
7
WITNESSING TWO TWO ACTS APOSTLES
BY IN THE OF THE
together in two narrative sequences. The first is the long Jerusalem
cycle concerning the healing of the lame man at the gate called
Beautiful (Acts 3-4) where the two are mentioned as a couple six
times. The second concerns the journey of Peter and John to sup-
port the work of Philip in Samaria (8,14). In each of these cycles,
both before the Sanhedrin at Jerusalem (5,40) and in their con-
frontation with Simon the magician (8,18), Peter and John are
labelled tout court as “the apostlesâ€, while instead it would have
been more appropriate to refer to them as “the two apostlesâ€.
All in all, it seems implied that the intention of Luke is to pre-
sent Peter and John as a couple, beginning with the list of the
Eleven in Acts 1,13 10 where John is placed surprisingly in second
position 11, immediately after Peter, who is himself surprisingly
separated from Andrew, his brother.
2. Of the Seven of Jerusalem, only Stephen and Philip
In the book of Acts, the Twelve are shown to have a special
relationship with the Seven who are elected at their request in
Jerusalem (6,1-6). In Jerusalem the Seven are at the flank of the
apostles (6,5-8,3), whereas the missionary activity in Samaria is
undertaken by them who are only later joined by the Twelve to
confirm and ratify their initiative (8,14-25). In this way, Luke
signals the beginning both of the geographical expansion of the
apostolic announcement outside Jerusalem, and of the prolongation
of the witness of the Twelve by means of new protagonists.
Concerning the unique relationship between Peter and John in Acts, cf.
10
for instance J. MUNCK, The Acts of the Apostles. Introduction, Translation and
Notes (Garden City, NY 1967) 7: “The list of apostles deviates from that given
in Luke vi, 13-16 especially in placing John directly after Peterâ€.
Cf. ROSSÉ, Atti degli Apostoli, 107: “... poiché Giovanni è regolarmente
11
menzionato insieme a Pietroâ€; KLIESCH, Apostelgeschichte, 33: “Johannes
rückt von den vierten auf die zweite Stelle, weil dieser in der Tradition der
Kapitel 3 – 5 mit Petrus zusammen auftrittâ€. Since Peter and John are presented
as a couple in Acts 1,13, it is difficult to accept the opinion of Betori (in Acts 1
the apostles are grouped three by three, Judas’ empty place included for the last
group), Schneider and Marguerat (the kaı divides the list into two groups of
Â¥
two, one of four, and one of three); cf. G. BETORI, Perseguitati a causa del
nome. Strutture dei racconti di persecuzione in Atti 1,12-8,4 (AnaBib 97; Roma
1981) 29; G. SCHNEIDER, Die Apostelgeschichte (Freiburg – Basel – Wien
1980) I, 207, n. 70 ; MARGUERAT, Les Actes des Apôtres, 50, n. 23.