Greg Goswell, «The Fate and Future of Zerubbabel in the Prophecy of Haggai», Vol. 91 (2010) 77-90
The final oracle of Haggai is often viewed as royalist in orientation, with the prophet promoting Zerubbabel as a royal (or even messianic) figure. This study seeks to dispute the majority view. Neither the election terms used nor the metaphor of the “seal” assign a royal identity to him. The focus is on the dual leadership of Zerubbabel and Joshua. Nowhere in the prophecy is Zerubbabel identified unequivocally as a Davidide. The temple orientation and the highlighting of divine action show that the establishment of God’s kingdom is in view, not the promotion of Zerubbabel as God’s vice-regent.
The Fate and Future of Zerubbabel
in the Prophecy of Haggai
In the prophecy of Haggai, Zerubbabel is usually paired with Joshua
(1,1.12.14 ; 2,2.4), but in the final oracle he is singled out for special
encouragement (2,20-23). It is commonly argued that the prophet Haggai
was a member of a messianic movement in Judah that was triggered by
the turmoil in the Persian empire after the death of Cambyses. The
argument runs that, occasioned by the political upheavals associated with
the contested accession of Darius to the throne in 522 BC, Zerubbabel,
who was of Davidic descent, was promoted by a partisan group as the
Judean king. Zerubbabel, however, disappeared without a trace after
520 BC. According to this theory, Zerubbabel was removed from office
(and maybe even executed) by the Persians due to his royal (messianic?)
pretensions 1. Not every Old Testament scholar is committed to this
particular theory 2, but it is true to say that most view the last four verses
of the prophecy of Haggai as royalist in orientation 3. In this article I argue
E.g. P. HAUPT, “The Coronation of Zerubbabelâ€, JBL 37 (1918) 209-218,
1
esp. 209 : “the nationalists hoped that Zerubbabel would rule over Judah as the
legitimate king†(he believed that a coronation of Zerubbabel took place in the
Spring of 519 BC) ; L. WATERMAN, “The Camouflaged Purge of Three
Messianic Conspiratorsâ€, JNES 13 (1954) 73-79; A.T. OLMSTEAD, History of
the Persian Empire (Chicago, IL 1948) 142; J. BRIGHT, A History of Israel
(Philadelphia, PA 42000) 369-372; R. ALBERTZ, A History of Israelite Religion
in the Old Testament Period (OTL ; Louisville, KY 1994) II, 451-454; S. LEVIN,
“ Zerubbabel : A Riddleâ€, JBQ 24 (1996) 14-17.
A c c o r d i n g to H.W. WOLFF , H a g g a i . A Commentary (Hermeneia;
2
M i n n e a p o l i s , MN 1988) 107: “Nothing gives us sufficient reason for
accusing Zerubbabel of short-sighted enthusiasm, as if he had put himself at the
head of an unrealistically impetuous movement for libertyâ€. Likewise,
T. MEADOWCROFT, Haggai (Readings : A New Biblical Commentary; Sheffield
2006) 201, 207, 219, sees no political challenge to Persian rule nor an
expectation of a Davidic revival.
E.g. R.T. SIEBENECK, “The Messianism of Aggeus and Proto-Zachariasâ€,
3
CBQ 19 (1957) 312-328; M. SWEENEY, The Twelve Prophets (Berit Olam;
Collegeville, PA 2000) II, 554-555; P.L. REDDITT, “The King in Haggai –
Zechariah 1-8 and the Book of the Twelveâ€, Tradition in Transition. Haggai and
Zechariah 1-8 in the Trajectory of Hebrew Theology (eds. M.J. BODA –
M.H. FLOYD) (LHBOTS 475; London 2008) 58-60.