Greg Goswell, «The Fate and Future of Zerubbabel in the Prophecy of Haggai», Vol. 91 (2010) 77-90
The final oracle of Haggai is often viewed as royalist in orientation, with the prophet promoting Zerubbabel as a royal (or even messianic) figure. This study seeks to dispute the majority view. Neither the election terms used nor the metaphor of the “seal” assign a royal identity to him. The focus is on the dual leadership of Zerubbabel and Joshua. Nowhere in the prophecy is Zerubbabel identified unequivocally as a Davidide. The temple orientation and the highlighting of divine action show that the establishment of God’s kingdom is in view, not the promotion of Zerubbabel as God’s vice-regent.
80 GREG GOSWELL
that this date formula is dependent on what is supplied in v. 10 above (“on
the twenty-fourth day of the ninth month, in the second year of Dariusâ€).
The (incomplete) date formula used in v. 20 indicates a close connection to
the previous oracle, suggesting that this new oracle is in continuity with
what precedes and is thematically complementary to it in certain ways 9.
The chronological connection is made explicit by the addition of “a second
time †in v. 20, with the narrator stating that this is the second time God
spoke to Haggai on that day. One of the features that links the final oracle
to the wider temple theology of the prophecy is that it shares the same day
as the preceding oracle, so that it is uttered on the very day that God has
announced will be the day from which he will bless his people (2,18-19).
The promise of harvest blessing at the end of 2,19 (“From this day on I
will bless [you]â€) that immediately precedes the oracle that is the focus of
my study suggests, on analogy, that 2,20-23 is an appropriate blessing for
Zerubbabel. Just as the people’s willing involvement in the rebuilding of
YHWH’S temple is the reason for the promised blessing (2,15b.18b), the
second oracle on the same day announces God’s favour toward Zerubbabel
presumably because of his role as governor in helping the temple-building
project (2,21: “Speak to Zerubbabel, governor of Judahâ€). The fact that the
oracle (like the preceding one) is dated on the day on which “the
foundation of the LORD’S temple was laid†(2,18) 10 supports the thesis that
it is Zerubbabel’s involvement in the project that explains this message of
encouragement for him 11.
4. Election terms
The terminology used in 2,20-23 in relation to Zerubbabel (“taken, my
servant, chosenâ€) is the terminology of election, but none of these
theologically loaded terms is so specifically royal as to require that
Zerubbabel is being addressed as the scion of the house of David 12. With
P.A . VERHOEF, “Notes on the Dates in the Book of Haggaiâ€, Text and
9
C o n t e x t . O l d Testament and Semitic Studies for F.C. Fe n s h a m (ed.
W. CLAASSEN) (JSOTSS 48; Sheffield 1988) 265. For a fuller listing of features
that show the affinity of 2,10-19 and 2,20-23, see M.J. BODA, Haggai,
Zechariah (NIV Application Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI 2004) 159-160.
Fo r this expression and how it may be reconciled with the
10
c o m m e n c e m e n t of work on temple at the earlier date in 1,15a, see
D.R. HILDEBRAND, “Temple Ritual: A Paradigm for Moral Holiness in Haggai
II 10-19â€, VT 39 (1989) 166-168.
Likewise in Zechariah 4, the word of YHWH to Zerubbabel (4,6-7) and to
11
the community about Zerubbabel (4,8-10a) both focus on him as temple-builder
and give encouragement that the project will be successfully completed.
W.H. ROSE, Zemah and Zerubbabel. Messianic Expectations in the Early
12
Postexilic Period (JSOTSS 304; Sheffield 2000) 208-218.