Greg Goswell, «The Fate and Future of Zerubbabel in the Prophecy of Haggai», Vol. 91 (2010) 77-90
The final oracle of Haggai is often viewed as royalist in orientation, with the prophet promoting Zerubbabel as a royal (or even messianic) figure. This study seeks to dispute the majority view. Neither the election terms used nor the metaphor of the “seal” assign a royal identity to him. The focus is on the dual leadership of Zerubbabel and Joshua. Nowhere in the prophecy is Zerubbabel identified unequivocally as a Davidide. The temple orientation and the highlighting of divine action show that the establishment of God’s kingdom is in view, not the promotion of Zerubbabel as God’s vice-regent.
82 GREG GOSWELL
these terms that restricts the allusion to the David tradition†17. An
impressive compilation of motifs that can have Davidic connotations
(including two of the terms used in v. 23) is also found, for example, in Isa
42,1-4, but it would be a mistake to automatically assign a royal identity to
the Isaianic figure of the servant of the Lord 18.
5. The signet ring
It is regularly asserted by scholars that the metaphor of the “sealâ€
applied to Zerubbabel (2,23: “I will make you into a seal†19) reverses the
judgment pronounced on Jehoiachin in Jer 22,24-30 20. According to Rose,
both the terminology “seal†(μtwj RSV “ signet ringâ€) and the details of the
picture in 2,23 are wrong for a kingship interpretation of the imagery (and
the same evaluation applies to Jeremiah 22) 21. God is depicted as wearing
the seal “on [his] right hand†(ynymy dy l[ μtwj) in the Jeremiah text, but that
is not a feature in Haggai. In neither passage is the seal taken from one
person and given to another, signalling the delegating of authority (in
contrast to Gen 41,42; Esth 3,10; 8,2). As stated by Rose, “the oracle [in
Hag 2,23] is not about God giving Zerubbabel a seal/signet ring to put on
his finger, but about God making Zerubbabel like a seal/signet ring†22. One
has to conclude, says Rose, that either Haggai mishandled the imagery or
the imagery was not meant to symbolise royal authority (in contrast to 1
Kgs 21,8). Seal imagery is used in the OT and the ANE to evoke the idea of
BODA, Haggai, Zechariah, 163, n. 17.
17
See G.R. GOSWELL, “ For my eyes have seen the Kingâ€. Kingship,
18
Human and Divine, in the Book of Isaiah with Special reference to Isaiah
Chapters 36-39 (unpublished PhD Dissertation; University of Sydney 2002) 86-
91.
As noted by WOLFF, Haggai, 105, the verb μyc with an accusative and the
19
preposition b mean “to make [someone] the equivalent of [something]â€.
E . g . K.-M. B E Y S E , S e r u b b a b e l und die Königserwartungen der
20
Propheten Haggai und Sacharja. Eine historische und traditionsgeschichtliche
U n t e r s u c h u n g (AzTh 48 ; Stuttgart 1972) 56-57, sees 2,20-23 as a
reinterpretation of Jer 22,24, marking Zerubbabel as YHWH’S vice-regent
(Vesir) ; K. SEYBOLD, “Die Königserwartung bei den Propheten Haggai und
Sacharja â€, Judaism 28 (1972) 71, 72; G. SAUER, “Serubbabel in der Sicht
Haggais und Sacharjasâ€, Das ferne und nahe Wort (FS L. ROST) (ed. F. MAAS)
(Berlin 1967) 204. It does not need to be viewed as a rebuttal of Jeremiah’s
prophecy — pace B. UFFENHEIMER “ Zerubabbel [sic]: The Messianic Hope of
the Returneesâ€, JBQ 24 (1996) 224.
For this paragraph, I acknowledge my substantial dependence upon
21
ROSE, Zemah and Zerubbabel, 218-238.
ROSE, “Messianic Expectationsâ€, 171 (addition mine).
22