Terrance Callan, «Use of the Letter of Jude by the Second Letter of Peter», Vol. 85 (2004) 42-64
Assuming that 2 Pet 2,1–3,3 is dependent on Jude 4-18, this essay describes in detail the way the author of 2 Peter has used Jude’s material. It is clear that the author of 2 Peter has not simply incorporated Jude, as is sometimes asserted. Rather, 2 Peter has thoroughly reworked Jude to serve its own purposes. 2 Pet 2,1–3,3 is best described as a free paraphrase of Jude 4-18. The relationship between the two texts is similar to the relationship between 1 Clem 36.2-5 and Heb 1,3-13.
62 Terrance Callan
Jude 18 contains a direct quotation of the predictions of the
apostles, “In the last time there will be scoffers, indulging their own
ungodly lustsâ€. 2 Pet 3,3 is an adaptation of this. In Jude the quotation
spells out what the readers are to remember. 2 Peter has transformed it
into an additional point made by Peter himself (52). The author of 2
Peter replaced the formula with which Jude introduced the quotation,
i.e., “for they said to youâ€, with the statement that the readers must
first know this; what they must know is an adaptation of Jude’s
quotation.
2 Peter changed the verb from “there will be†to “there will comeâ€
and put it first in the sentence. 2 Peter changed “in the last time†to “in
the last daysâ€; Bauckham observes that the latter is the more familiar
expression (53). Before mentioning the scoffers, 2 Peter inserted the
phrase “with scoffingâ€. Bauckham sees this as an imitation of the style
of the Septuagint (54). It is also another example of paronomasia. 2
Peter followed Jude 18 closely in describing the scoffers as “indulging
their own lustsâ€. However, 2 Peter used a different word for “their
own†than Jude 18 did, and 2 Peter omitted “ungodlyâ€. All of these
changes seem to reflect stylistic preferences on the part of 2 Peter. 2
Peter then went on in 3,4 to a direct quotation of the content of the
false teaching, after which 2 Peter refuted it.
Thus 2 Pet 3,1-3 is an adaptation of Jude 17-18. 2 Pet 3,1 does not
derive from Jude. But 2 Pet 3,2-3 is virtually a quotation of Jude 17-
18. However, the author of 2 Peter made many small changes in this
material to make it better serve his purpose and to reflect his stylistic
preferences.
*
**
We began by noting that in adapting Jude the author of 2 Peter
transformed Jude’s critique of the behavior of its opponents into a
critique of opponents who will not only behave improperly, but also
teach falsely, i.e., deny that Jesus will come again. 2 Peter also
transformed Jude’s critique of present opponents into a prediction that
opponents will arise in the future.
(52) BAUCKHAM (Jude, 2 Peter, 283) suggests that the author of 2 Peter here
transforms Jude’s quotation of the apostles into a direct statement of the apostle
Peter. So also WATSON, Invention, 127 n. 325.
(53) Jude, 2 Peter, 288.
(54) Jude, 2 Peter, 289. So also WATSON, Invention, 127.