170 Stephen H. Levinsohn continued to cry out as Jesus entered Jerusalem. Because the inchoative aorist is also a non-default tense-form, its use in Luke 19,37 has a similar effect, one difference being that, as soon as the praising begins, some of the Pharisees in the crowd attempt to stop it (v. 39)36. In the same way, the Relevance Theory approach to markedness allows the combination found in Luke 19,29 of aorist ἐγένετο and an aorist temporal expression to have a similar effect to the HPs in the parallel passage in Mark 11,1-2 (see sec. F below). In summary, distinguishing between the “meaning” of a tense-form such as the imperfect, which remains basically unchanged, and the “overtones” associated with it, which vary with the context, results in an approach to prominence that is intuitively more satisfying than one in which a fixed degree of prominence is assigned to each tense-form. It is helpful, too, to distinguish between occasions when the tense-form is the most relevant way of portraying an event and those in which it is not, as this explains why the same tense-form sometimes seems to be a foregrounding device while, in other passages, it does not. F) Which event is given prominence by a non-default form? This final section reaffirms that, when a non-default form or structure is employed, prominence is often given not to the event concerned, but to the following event(s)37. This is particularly evident when the HP is used. Although Porter affirms, “the present form draws added attention to the action to which it refers”38, Callow insists that, particularly in Mark and John, the HP “does not draw attention to the event which the HP verb itself refers to, as those events, in themselves, are not particularly important --- to go, to say, to gather together, to see, etc. ... [I]t has a cataphoric function; that is, it points on beyond itself into the narrative, it draws attention to what is following”39. So, in Mark 1,21 (“they enter [εἰσπορεύονται] into Capernaum”), “it is not the action of entering Capernaum itself that is particularly 36 “They think that Jesus should restrain the fervour of his disciples” (I.H. Marshall, The Gospel of Luke: A Commentary on the Greek Text. [Exeter 1978]) 716. 37 See Levinsohn Self-Instruction §5.4 for discussion of this point. 38 S.E. Porter, Idioms of the Greek New Testament (Sheffield 1992) 31. 39 J. Callow, The Historic Present in Mark (Horsleys Green, UK 1996) 2. For further dis- cussion of this point, see Levinsohn Discourse Features 202-203 and Fanning Contribution 17-19. Westfall (Analysis of Prominence 77) also allows for the “domain of prominence” to be “at the level of couplet, paragraph, section or discourse”.