Stephen H. Levinsohn, «Aspect and Prominence in the Synoptic Accounts of Jesus’ Entry into Jerusalem», Vol. 23 (2010) 161-174
Porter’s analysis of the prominence conveyed by the aorist, imperfect and present is contrasted with Longacre’s claims about the same tenseforms. Both are wrong in equating respectively “foreground” (Porter) and “background” (Longacre) with the imperfect. Relevance Theory claims that non-default forms may result in a variety of cognitive effects. This explains why imperfectives correlate with background, yet sometimes have foregrounding effects. Additional non-default forms and structures can also be accommodated, such as inchoative aorist "erxanto" and the combination of aorist "egeneto" and a temporal expression. Finally, a non-default form or structure may give prominence not to the event concerned, but to the following event(s).
Aspect and Prominence in the Synoptic Accounts of Jesus' Entry into Jerusalem 171
important. Rather, the presence of the HP points on beyond itself and
draws attention to the subsequent events that take place in Capernaum”40.
In other words, εἰσπορεύονται gives prominence not so much to the act
of entering Capernaum as to Jesus teaching in the synagogue and the
amazement of the crowd (ἐδίδασκεν, ἐξεπλήσσοντο) at his teaching (vv.
21b-22).
Turning to the HPs in Mark 11,1-2, we have already noted out that the
parallel passage in Luke 19,29-30 has instead the combination of ἐγένετο
and a temporal expression which “picks out from the general background
the specific circumstance for the foreground events that are to follow”41.
This means that both gospels use a non-default form of encoding which
gives prominence to the events that result from Jesus sending his disciples
for a colt.
Similarly, the HP in Mark 11,5, while no doubt giving prominence
to the untying (λύουσιν) of the colt as instructed, also points forward
to the response of the onlookers, culminating in the disciples receiving
permission to take the colt (v. 6).
Finally, the effect of using HPs in Mark 11,7 to encode the bringing
of the colt to Jesus (φέρουσιν) and the laying of their cloaks over it
(ἐπιβάλλουσιν) is to point forward to what happens afterwards; namely,
Jesus sitting on it (ἐκάθισεν) and the responses of the crowd on seeing
him on it (vv. 8-10).
The effect of the HPs in Mark 11,1-7, then, is to direct the readers’
attention first to what happens after Jesus sends his disciples for a colt42,
then to what happens when they untie it and, finally, to what happens
after they have led it to Jesus and laid their cloaks over it (see the Table
below). The peak of the episode is still the response of the crowd as he
made his way to Jerusalem, but prominence is given to that response not
only by the imperfect in v. 9, but also by the HPs earlier in the episode,
which keep pointing forward to the next set of resulting events.
As they draw near (ἐγγίζουσιν) to Jerusalem, to Bethphage and Bethany at prominent:
11,1
the Mount of Olives, he sends (ἀποστέλλει) two of his disciples, points forward
and he says (λέγει) to them, “Go to the village ahead of you and, just as you
enter it, you will find a colt tied there, which no one has ever ridden. Untie prominent:
2-3
it and bring it here. If anyone asks you, ‘Why are you doing this?’ tell him, points forward
‘The Lord needs it and will send it back here shortly’.”
Levinsohn Discourse Features 202.
40
Levinsohn Discourse Features 177.
41
42
Cross-linguistically, reported speeches are often backgrounded with respect to the
events that follow them (Levinsohn Self-Instruction §5.2.2), which explains why the HP
often introduces reported speeches (Levinsohn Discourse Features 202).