Matthew D. McDill, «A Textual and Structural Analysis of Mark 16:9-20.», Vol. 17 (2004) 27-44
The purpose of this study is to address two questions: 1) Should Mark 16:9-20 be included in biblical exegesis and 2) If so, what are the structural features of this passage that might aid in its interpretation? In order to answer the first question, the external and internal evidence concerning this passage as a textual variant and the question of its canonicity will be explored.
The second question will be answered by presenting a diagram of the passage’s syntactical and semantic structure and by making observations concerning the unit’s overall structure and development.
A Textual and Structural Analysis of Mark 16:9-20 41
order to communicate his message. The message is partly discovered in
the progression of the disciples’ reaction to the resurrection of Christ,
from unbelief to preaching everywhere.
These three concepts, Jesus’ appearing (and resurrection), belief (or
unbelief), and preaching, appear several other times in the passage and
thus also become elements of its thematic unity. In addition to each
sub-unit recording that Jesus appeared (á¼Ï†Î¬Î½Î·, á¼Ï†Î±Î½ÎµÏώθη), the first
sub-unit says that “he was alive and had been seen†(ζῇ καὶ á¼Î¸ÎµÎ¬Î¸Î·) and
the third sub-unit refers to “those who saw him after he had risen†(τοῖς
θεασαμÎνοις αá½Ï„ὸν á¼Î³Î·Î³ÎµÏμÎνον). In addition to the references to the
disciples’ unbelief in the first two sub-units and their preaching (and thus
belief) in the last, the last sub-unit also refers to faith five more times
(τὴν ἀπιστίαν αá½Ï„ῶν καὶ σκληÏοκαÏδίαν, á¼Ï€Î¯ÏƒÏ„ευσαν, ὠπιστεÏσας,
ἀπιστήσας, τοῖς πιστεÏσασιν). Finally, each sub-unit contains the con-
cept of preaching or announcing: Mary reported Jesus’ appearance, the
two disciples reported Jesus’ appearance, Jesus commanded the disciples
to preach, and the disciples went out and preached. The content of the
disciples’ message can be implied from the parallel to the other reports:
preach that Jesus is alive!
In addition to these themes, there is also the unifying sub-theme of
the demonstration of supernatural power. Mary is identified in sub-unit
one as the one “from whom he had cast out seven demons†(Ï€Î±Ï á¼§Ï‚
á¼ÎºÎ²ÎµÎ²Î»Î®ÎºÎµÎ¹ ἑπτὰ δαιμόνια). Some have argued that this identification
indicates that Mary is being introduced for the first time and therefore
reveals that the LE has a different author or is from another work. How-
ever, as Terry points out, this is a literary device that identifies someone
who has already been introduced in the form of a flashback. Mark uses
this device four other times in his gospel. The author may be using this
device to make a special emphasis. Its presence becomes even more signi-
ficant as one notices that each sub-unit mentions some demonstration
of supernatural power. The second sub-unit mentions the fact that Jesus
appeared “in another form,†which, as we learn in Luke, caused them not
to be able to recognize him. The third sub-unit includes the miraculous
signs that will accompany those who believe.
Embedded in the third sub-unit is the direct discourse of Jesus. This
contains one exhortation and three assertions. The exhortation is Mark’s
version of the great commission. It focuses on proclamation, like Luke,
instead of discipleship, like Matthew. It emphasizes the universality of
the mission even more than Matthew and Luke by making the territory
“into the whole world†(εἰς τὸν κόσμον ἅπαντα) and the audience “all
creation†(πάσῃ τῇ κτίσει) instead of “every nation. “ The first two as-
sertions are parallel and have unique structural features of their own.