76 oLeGS ANdreJeVS to 6,37 is particularly instructive. While 6,36 contains a command to imitate the Father, in 6,37-38 the admonition not to judge is grounded in the example of Jesus who is subsequently presented as o` dida,skaloj (6,40) and ku,rioj (6,46). The sermon’s Imitatio Dei section (6,35c-d; 6,29-36) therefore is framed with material focused on the imitation of the Son of Man and Lord Jesus (6,20b-28; 6,37-49), with the climactic parable of the two houses depicting what is at stake (6,47-49). This arrangement of the sermon does not seem coincidental and strongly reflects the Q2 author’s depiction of the transfer of authority (outlined in 4,1-13; 10,21-22; 13,34-35) from yHWH to his Son Jesus. In the light of this Christological arrangement and focus, one is led to question the assessment of the Q sermon as sapiential 42. Not only does that assessment fail to withstand the above listed literary-critical and Christological considerations, but it also falters on form-critical grounds. Beginning with the admonition not to judge, Q 6,37-42 func- tions as an accusation speech directed against a group member who is addressed as u`pokrita, in 6,42 43. Here, even those scholars who are otherwise convinced that 6,20b-49 is sapiential in form have frequent- ly conceded that 6,42, along with some immediately adjacent material, fall outside that alleged pattern 44. Accusations, of course, do not typically exist in a vacuum, which leads Fitzmyer to correctly identify Luke 6,37-42 as a separate sub-section in the Sermon on the plain 45. And while Fitzmyer does not identify the form of that subsection as a trial speech, the comparable speeches in the Tanakh and the Lxx allow one to further develop his observations 46. examples of trial 42 KLoppeNBorG, Formation, 189. 43 The inner-community setting of 6,37-42 has been recognized by r. pIper, Wisdom in the Q-tradition. The Aphoristic Teaching of Jesus (Cambridge 1989) 42-43. 44 JACoBSoN, First Gospel, 103-104; KLoppeNBorG, Formation, 185; pIper, Wisdom, 43. 45 FITzMyer, Luke I–IX, 641-643. Luke 6,37-42 follows the sequence of Q 6,37-42, rendering Fitzmyer’s observation entirely applicable to the third section of the Q sermon. Q 6,37-42 was subsequently also identified as a compo- sitional unit in pIper, Wisdom, 36-44. 46 Accusations/accusation speeches belong to the trial genres in old Testa- ment literature. For definitions see: G.W. CoATS, Exodus 1–18 (FoTL; Grand rapids, MI 1999) 156, 173-174; S.J. de VrIeS, 1 and 2 Chronicles (FoTL; Grand rapids, MI 1989) 436; M.A. SWeeNey, Isaiah 1–39 (FoTL; Grand rapids, MI 1996) 512, 541-542. related forms include: (a) reproof speeches; (b) accusatory questions. For definitions see: M.H. FLoyd, Minor Prophets (FoTL; Grand rapids, MI 2000) II, 648; de VrIeS, 1 and 2 Chronicles, 427.