C. John Collins, «Colossians 1,17 'hold together': A co-opted term», Vol. 95 (2014) 64-87
The Greek terms rendered 'hold together' in Col 1,17 (sunistemi), Wis 1,7 (suneko), and Sir 43,26 (sugkeimai) do not derive from Septuagint renderings of the Hebrew Bible; instead they are terms that Second Temple Jewish and Greek Christian apologists co-opted from Hellenistic philosophy to commend 'biblical' concepts to the Graeco-Roman world. From these texts we can infer the semantic relationships of these verbs. The 'liturgical composition' in Col 1,15-20 displays a combination of biblical wisdom and co-opted philosophy.
04_Biblica_Collins_Layout 1 01/04/14 11:47 Pagina 85
85
COLOSSIANS 1,17 “HOLD TOGETHERâ€: A CO-OPTED TERM
These factors make it likely that Col 1,15-17 represents the per-
sonified “Wisdom†of Proverbs as a Person who became “incar-
nate†in Jesus Christ 49.
This does not account for all of the background to the composi-
tion, as many have noted 50. Christ as “the image of the invisible
God†(1,15) evokes the way that God made humankind “in the
image of God†(katV eivko,na qeou/, Gen 1,27). New Testament au-
thors echo this usage (1 Cor 11,7; 15,49; 2 Cor 3,18; Col 3,10), and
apply it to Jesus as the image of God par excellence (Rom 8,29;
2 Cor 4,4) 51. Perhaps “firstbornâ€, at least in v. 18, reflects the ap-
plication of that title to the Davidic king (Ps 89,27): NT writers
apply that title to Jesus (Rom 8,29; Heb 1,6; Rev 1,5), and portray
his resurrection as the event that elevated him to the Davidic throne
(cf. Acts 13,33; Rom 1,4; Eph 1,20; 2 Tim 2,8). Since the Davidic
king was to embody the whole people of God (cf. Exod 4,22; Jer
31,9; Pss. Sol. 18,4), it follows that he was to embody faithfulness
to God, which meant that he was to show forth the true image of
God. To the NT authors, Jesus carried out this role perfectly 52.
A further text that may have suggested a link between Wisdom
and Adam is Wis 7,26, where personified Wisdom is “an image of
his [God’s] goodness†(eivkw.n th/j avgaqo,thtoj auvtou/), in com-
parison with Wis 2,23, where “God created mankind for incorrup-
sians was based on the Hebrew berē’šîṯ (combining Genesis 1 with Prov 8,22);
but this would have been invisible to a Greek-speaking audience; and the dis-
cussion here shows that a connection with Proverbs (LXX) is visible without it.
49
Cf. DUNN, Colossians and Philemon, 86: “the passage can be quite prop-
erly classified as an early Christian hymn in which Christ is praised in lan-
guage used commonly in Hellenistic Judaism in reference to divine Wisdomâ€.
50
For these points, compare G.K. BEALE, “Colossiansâ€, Commentary on
the New Testament Use of the Old Testament (eds. G.K. BEALE – D.A. CAR-
SON) (Grand Rapids, MI 2007) 841-870, at 851-855.
51
As Matthews notes, “there is likely a blend of Wisdom and Adam motifs
in the language of Christ as the eivkw.n of God in v. 15†(forthcoming article
cited in n. 44).
52
See also LIGHTFOOT, Colossians and Philemon, 146. In the same dis-
cussion, Lightfoot suggests that the way that Philo refers to the Logos as
God’s “firstborn†might also be part of the background; however, he notes
that Philo’s term is prwto,gonoj (rather than prwto,tokoj), though he does
not show why we should treat the two terms as interchangeable. (Perhaps the
textual variation between these two words in Sir 36,11 [Heb. v. 17] might
provide such evidence?) Since the Biblical connection is straightforward and
adequate, I judge the reference to Philo as unlikely.