Terrance Callan, «Reading the Earliest Copies of 2 Peter», Vol. 93 (2012) 427-450
An examination of the three earliest extant copies of 2 Peter (namely those found in Papyrus 72, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus) is made in order to determine how the meaning of 2 Peter is affected by differences among the three copies, especially the textual variations among them. These textual variations produce significantly different understandings of Jesus in the three copies of 2 Peter, as well as other less prominent differences in meaning.
06_Biblica_1_D_Callan_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:20 Pagina 449
449
READING THE EARLIEST COPIES OF 2 PETER
able original text. Readers of Codex Sinaiticus found a text in
which some of the probable original text’s difficulties had been
moderated and whose meaning was more explicit than that of the
likely original text. Readers of 2 Peter in Vaticanus read a text very
close to that of the probable original text.
Readers of 2 Peter in P72 did not read it as part of the Bible and
did not read a text written by an expert professional scribe. Readers
of 2 Peter in Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus did read it as part of
the Bible and read a professionally copied text. But the work of the
scribe of Vaticanus was much better than that of Sinaiticus.
Appendix A
Itacisms and other errors based on replacing a letter or letters
with similar sounding letters in P72.
Itacisms of various kinds.
1. ei for i – 45 times [in 1,1.2 (twice).3.4 (four times).5 (twice).6.8.
9.10.12.13.14.16.20 (three times); 2,1.6.7.10 (three times).
13 (twice).17.18.19.20.21.22 (three times); 3,1.3 (twice).
4.7.11.14.15]
2. i for ei – 29 times [in 1,3 (twice).6 (twice).7.11.12 (twice).13.
14.16.20.21; 2,1.2 (twice).3.4.5.6.7.15.21; 3,1.10.11
(twice).12.15]
3. e for ai – 26 times [in 1,1.4.10 (twice).11.13.19 (twice); 2,1
(twice).5 (twice).7.8 (twice).17 (three times).18.19 (twice).
21; 3,3 (twice).13.16]
ai for e
4. – 2 times [in 3,14.17]
h for ei
5. – 3 times [in 1,2.6; 3,18]
a for e
6. – 2 times [in 2,15; 3,14]
u for oi
7. – 8 times [in 2,8.14.22; 3,1.10 (twice).12.16]
Other errors based on replacing a letter or letters with a similar
sounding letter or letters include:
1. o for w (1,3) and w for o (1,19; 3,8 – or is this a change from ac-
cusative to dative case?)
2. o for ou (1,5)
3. nk instead of gk (1,6 [twice]; 2,8)
4. t instead of p (1,9.21)
5. inserting n before t (1,15)