Robert B. Jr. Chisholm, «Israel’s Retreat and the Failure of Prophecy in 2 Kings 3», Vol. 92 (2011) 70-80
This is not a story of failed or deceptive prophecy, but rather an account of Israel’s failure in the face of opposition. YAHWEH’s promise was inherently contingent upon Israel’s willingness to bring it to completion. Their failure to do so is not surprising. Jehoram’s partial success in battle ironically mirrors his partial commitment to YAHWEH (vv. 1-3). As such, the concluding report of Israel’s retreat combines with the introductory report to form a thematic inclusio for the chapter: Those whose commitment to YAHWEH is half-hearted invariably forfeit his blessing.
77
ISRAEL’S RETREAT FAILURE PROPHECY 2 KINGS 3
AND THE OF IN
deceptive prophecy to Jerusalem in the days of Jeremiah, delivered
through false prophets who were denied access to YAHWEH’s heavenly
assembly, was a bold-faced lie (Jer 4,10). Elisha himself sent a deceptive
message to Ben-Hadad via Hazael, assuring the king he would recover
from an illness, when in reality he would die (2 Kgs 8,10.14) 29. Once
again, the deceptive message is an outright lie. Elisha’s oracle in 2 Kings
3 does not fit the pattern we see elsewhere, where deceptive prophecy is
an outright lie, not an ambiguous oracle capable of dual interpretations.
The parallels between 1 Kings 22 and 2 Kings 3 are undeniable, but their
significance can be explained differently than Long has done.
5. An Alternative Proposal
I would like to offer an alternative proposal for understanding the
strange case of Israel’s retreat in 2 Kings 3,27. As stated earlier, my thesis
is that the prophecy did indeed fail. But like most prophecies, the fulfill-
ment of Elisha’s oracle of victory was contingent upon Israel’s willing-
ness to bring it to completion. This is not a story about the failure of
YAHWEH’s promise, but rather an account of Israel’s dismal failure in the
face of opposition.
6. Contingency in prophecy
Prophetic discourse is typically expository-hortatory and predictive 30.
The former evaluates the recipient’s character and appeals for a positive
response. Predictive discourse can be dynamic or performative in func-
tion. When predictive discourse announces God’s intentions uncondition-
ally, it is performative, since it sets in motion an inevitable outcome. But
prophetic predictive discourse is more often dynamic. It announces God’s
intentions conditionally and is intended to motivate a positive response to
the hortatory discourse it typically accompanies 31. In this case the proph-
ecy’s predictive element is designed to prevent (in the case of a judgment
In verse 10 the Kethib reads : “Go, say: ‘You will surely not get well’â€.
29
The Qere, which is supported by some Hebrew manuscripts and the ancient
versions, reads: “Go, say to him: ‘You will surely get well’.†In the Kethib
version Elisha gives Hazael a true message, but Hazael falsely communicates
the oracle to Ben-Hadad. In the Qere version Elisha tells Hazael to lie to the
king.
R. CHISHOLM, “When Prophecy Appears to Fail, Check Your Herme-
30
neutic â€, JETS 53 (2010) 562.
E. CLENDENEN, “Textlinguistics and Prophecy in the Book of the
31
Twelve â€, JETS 46 (2003) 388-90.