Brent A. Strawn, «Jonah’s Sailors and Their Lot Casting: A Rhetorical-Critical Observation», Vol. 91 (2010) 66-76
Several considerations suggest that the sailors’ lot casting in Jonah 1 is unusual and meant to be both surprising and literarily delightful. The most important of these is the correspondence between the sailors and the Ninevites within the book’s rhetorical structure. This correspondence suggests that the sailors’ lot casting is a particularly Israelite practice with the sailors themselves appearing as adepts in Israelite ritual activity. That depiction corresponds to the Ninevites’ ability to know precisely how to repent in chapter 3. In both cases, the foreigners are portrayed in particularly pious ways in contrast to the reluctant prophet.
72 BRENT A. STRAWN
on the scene 18. In this process, the sailors are being painted in Israelite garb,
as it were, and are depicted as adepts in Israelite ritual practice.
The fourth and perhaps most significant consideration pertains to the
structure of the book of Jonah itself. It takes its clue from the
corresponding episode in Scene Two, which shows the Ninevites in full
repentance (3,5-10). Despite Jonah’s recalcitrance and his ultra-brief
oracle — only five Hebrew words which never once mention God, never
once raise the possibility of averting judgment and obtaining forgiveness,
and provide no instructions whatsoever as to how the Ninevites should
respond — the people of Nineveh, “from the greatest to the least†(3,5; cf.
3,6-8), repent, and they do so with panache. Even the animals don
sackcloth and join in the prayer and fasting (3,7-8)! Compared to the
reluctant prophet, these “pagan†Ninevites 19 cannot wait to obey, are
dying to repent, and know exactly what to do and how to do it, without
any coaching, encouragement, or instructions from Jonah, the reluctant
prophet 20.
The diptychal, symmetrical construction of the book of Jonah suggests
that something similar may be at work in the sailors and, especially, their
lot casting in 1,7. Indeed, the sailors move from each crying out to his own
god (1,5a), to lot casting (1,7), to a full-blown and highly eloquent prayer to
Yahweh by name (1,14). That prayer is preceded by valiant attempts to
return Jonah safely to dry land (1,13), and is followed by worship (ary),
sacrifice (jbz), and vow-making (rdn) to Yahweh, again by name (1,16). The
dense collection of pious terminology in 1,16 makes it hard to avoid the
impression that the sailors are presented as converts to Yahwism 21. Be that
as it may, the sailors clearly proceed developmentally, as it were, along the
following lines 22 :
Cf. H.W. WOLFF, Obadiah and Jonah. A Commentary (Minneapolis,
18
MN 1986) 114: “Narrator and readers evidently have in mind a familiar
procedure, which they think would be applicable even on board a ship during a
storm at seaâ€; and LIMBURG, Jonah, 52: “The exact procedure is not described;
it would have been familiar to the first hearers of the story†(my emphases in
both cases).
One might wonder if the reference to idol-worshippers in 2,9 is the
19
prophet’s own perspective on both the sailors in chapter 1 and the Ninevites in
chapter 3. TRIBLE, Rhetorical Criticism, 171-172, argues that the description fits
neither group, which is no doubt true on the narrative level, but may not be true
on the characterological level of the prophet himself.
Cf. TRIBLE, Rhetorical Criticism, 182.
20
Cf. WOLFF’s (Obadiah and Jonah, 105) title to the larger unit is “The
21
Missionary Fruits of a Flight from Godâ€.
TRIBLE, too, uses the language of development for the sailors (“[t]he
22
developing portrait of the sailors gives ample reasons for their conversionâ€) but