Gerald Klingbeil - Chantal J. Klingbeil, «‘Eyes to Hear’: Nehemiah 1,6 from a Pragmatics and Ritual Theory Perspective», Vol. 91 (2010) 91-102
This study of the enigmatic phrase K1d:@b;(a tla@pit@-l)e (amo#$li tw$xw%tup; K1yney('w: “and your eyes open to listen to the prayer of your servant” (Neh 1,6) utilizes an interdisciplinary approach involving insights from linguistic pragmatics and ritual theory. We will begin with a brief review of the history of interpretation of this phrase. Particular attention will then be given to elements of ritual theory, such as trigger point, ritual language, time, place, sequence, etc. Finally, we will examine the pragmatic context, discourse, and conversational strategies involved with this phrase.
94 GERALD A. KLINGBEIL – CHANTAL J. KLINGBEIL
not provide all the relevant data. In the following we will ask Neh 1,6 some
of the questions that ritual theory is raising.
What triggers Nehemiah’s prayer (which should be considered a ritual
act) in Neh 1,5–11? Clearly, the news received by Hanani (1,2), a fellow
Jew who had recently traveled with some companions from Jerusalem to
the Persian capital Susa, describing the sad state of affairs in Jerusalem,
triggered a strong ritual response by Nehemiah, highlighting the fact that
ritual is often a recourse in crisis and a response when people feel
overwhelmed by a crisis. It is interesting to note that while the main
concerns regarding Jerusalem involved the broken walls and burnt gates of
the city (Neh 1,3) and seemingly had no direct bearing on religious matters
(such as temple worship, sacrificial procedures, priestly order, etc.),
Nehemiah’s reaction is couched in religious garb and represents a
ritualized response 13. Upon hearing this news report, Nehemiah sits down
and weeps and for several days he mourns, which involved fasting and
praying. The emotive response of sitting down (bvy) and weeping (hkb)
appears regularly in the Hebrew Bible in response to bad news or lack of
hope. Hagar and Ishmael are expelled from Abraham’s camp and wander
about in the desert. When they cannot find any water Hagar moves away
from Ishmael and sits down and weeps (Gen 21,16). Similarly, a female
prisoner of war that married an Israelite had to stay (lit. “sitâ€) in the house
for a full month and cry for her father and mother (Deut 21,13) 14, while the
tribes of Israel (except Benjamin) sit and weep over the horrific crime that
the Benjamites from Gibeah had committed (Judg 20,26) 15.
This ritualized response seems to have served at least two purposes:
first, it functions as a public signal that something was terribly wrong and
Ritualization is an important strategy of constructing new power
13
relationships and dealing with new (and often disturbing) situations where no
set ritual is available. Compare here BELL, Ritual, 77-83 and J. BRUMBERG-
KRAUS, “‘Not by Bread Alone...’: The Ritualization of Food and Table Talk in
the Passover Seder and in the Last Supperâ€, Semeia 86 (1999) 165-191.
Compare also the helpful comments in F.H. GORMAN JR., “Ritualizing, Rite
and Pentateuchal Theologyâ€, Prophets and Paradigms. Essays in Honor of
Gene M. Tucker (ed. S.B. REID) (JSOTSS 229; Sheffield 1996) 173-186.
Compare here the insightful comments found in C.H. GORDON, “Father’s
14
Sons and Mother’s Daughters in Ugaritic, in the Ancient Near East and in
Mandaic Magic Textsâ€, “Und Mose schrieb dieses Lied aufâ€. Studien zum
Alten Testament und zum Alten Orient (FS Oswald Loretz) (eds. M. DIETRICH
– I. KOTTSIEPER – H. SCHAUDIG) (AOAT 250) (Münster 1998) 319-324, and
earlier J.P. WEINBERG, “Das beit ‘abot im 6-4 Jh v u zâ€, VT 23 (1973) 400-411.
Other references from the Hebrew Bible containing the combination of
15
sitting (bvy) and weeping (hkb) can be found in Judg 21,2; 2 Kgs 22,19; 2 Chr
34,27 ; Ps 137,1; Isa 30,19; and Ezek 8,14.