Wilson de Angelo Cunha, «A Brief Discussion of MT Isaiah 24,14-16», Vol. 90 (2009) 530-544
Recent scholarship interprets Isaiah 24,14-16 in light of a “prophetic disputation pattern” genre, which sees the praise in vv. 14-15 as an assertion and the “I” statement in v. 16b as the counter-assertion, thus, correcting the assertion in vv. 14-15. This article seeks to challenge this interpretation and argue that the “I” statement in v. 16b does not need to function as a “counter-assertion” to the praise in vv. 14-15 but, rather, as introducing the proclamation of judgment for the unrighteous (v. 16c).
A Brief Discussion of MT Isaiah 24,14-16 543
proclamation of judgment against the “ones who act faithlesslyâ€
mentioned in v. 16c and following. In this sense, v. 16 presents two
contrastive messages: first, the proclamation of hope for the righteous
in v. 16a and the proclamation of doom for the “ones acting faithlesslyâ€
in v. 16b-18.
In sum, MT Isa 24,14-16 can be read as follows:
vv. 14-15: Praise by the “ones spared from judgmentâ€
v. 16a: Proclamation of salvation to the “righteousâ€
v. 16b: Proclamation of doom to the “ones acting faithlesslyâ€
*
**
This contribution discussed three main problems in MT Isa 24,14-
16: first, the identification of hmh in v. 14a; second, the interpretation of
the phrase qydxl ybx in v. 16a; and, third, the function of the “Iâ€
statement in v. 16b. By studying how LXX Isa resolved these issues,
this paper has proposed the following aspects as a solution to those
three main problems: first, the hmh in v. 14a should be identified with
the “ones who were spared from judgmentâ€. This group is present in the
imagery of the “gleanings†in v. 13 and in the phrase “a few will be leftâ€
in v. 6; second, the phrase qydxl ybx in v. 16a should be taken not as a
divine title but as the proclamation of salvation to the righteous person;
support for this interpretation was found in the use of the same
expression qydxl in Isa 26,7, where it clearly denotes a “righteous
personâ€. Finally, we have argued that the “I†statement in v. 16b does
not function as a “counter-assertion†to the praise in vv. 14-15; it, rather,
functions as an announcement of doom to the faithless mentioned in the
last part of v. 16 and in the following verses. As such, this paper has
argued that there is no need to interpret vv. 14-16 in light of a “prophetic
disputation pattern†genre. In this way, the study of the reception of Isa
24,14-16 in LXX Isa provided insights and confirmed our interpretation
of three main problems in Isa 24,14-16.
Leiden Universiteit Wilson de Angelo CUNHA
Matthias de Vrieshof 1
2300 RA Leiden
The Netherlands