Giancarlo Biguzzi, «Is the Babylon of Revelation Rome or Jerusalem?», Vol. 87 (2006) 371-386
The Babylon of Revelation 17–18 has been interpreted as imperial Rome since
antiquity, but some twenty interpreters have rejected such a solution in recent
centuries and have held that Babylon instead should be Jerusalem. This is not a
minor question since it changes the interpretation of the whole book, because Rev
would become all of a sudden an anti-Jewish libel, after having been an anti-
Roman one. This article discusses the pros and cons of the two interpretations and
concludes that the traditional one matches both the details and the plot of the book
much more than any other.
Is the Babylon of Revelation Rome or Jerusalem? 381
penalty by sword (13,10b) or by axe (pepelekismevnoi, 20,4), since the
Jewish death penalty was by stoning (35).
(2) Prostitution. — It is of course true that Israel in the OT is
represented as Adonay’s bride and is charged with harlotry, but
prostitution (porneiva) is not to be hurriedly identified with adultery
(moiceiva), because an unmarried woman can also be a harlot.
Furthermore, Tyre (Is 23,17) and Nineveh (Nah 3,4) are accused of
harlotry as well. Finally, whereas in the OT Jerusalem is accused of
letting itself be corrupted by the idolatry of the nations, in Rev, on the
contrary, Babylon is corrupting them with its own idolatry (36).
(3) Physical and political geography supposed in Rev 13 and 18. -
The Beast of Rev 13, which rises from the sea (v. 1), has authority over,
or is adored by “all the earth†(v. 3), “every tribe and people and tongue
and nation†(v. 7), and “all the inhabitants of the earth†(v. 8)(37). The
Babylon of Rev 17-18 has corrupted, or has enriched, or is mourned by
“all the nations†(18,3), “the kings and merchants of the earthâ€
(18,3b.9.11.17), and “all those who had ships at sea†(18,19). Such a sea,
that bathes many regions with their many peoples of different languages
and cultures, is recognisable as the Mediterranean sea, whereas the
multi-ethnic reign and its capital city, are recognisable as the Roman
empire and Rome, much more conveniently than as Jerusalem (38).
(35) The root pelek- is found around 1,050 times in the Greek literature from
the VIII century B.C. to the XV century A.D. Among the Jewish writers, Philo of
Alexandria makes use of it only once (Prov. 2,29,6), and Flavius Josephus eighteen
times, but mentioning the axe only three times in “Jewish†episodes: two times to
say that the golden eagle which Herod placed on the temple was demolished with
the strokes of an axe (Ant. iud. 17,155; Bell. iud. 1, 651) and another to say that with
an axe a chain was broken. Elsewhere, for Josephus, the axe is the weapon of the
bodyguards of the king Artaxerxes in Ant. iud. 11,205, and, in all the remaining
occurrences, is always a weapon used by the Romans to put people to death.
(36) It is sufficient, for example, to say that one of the texts quoted for the
“harlotry†of Jerusalem by Beagley (p. 67) and Lupieri (p. 249) is Ez 23,27 where
it is spoken of as a harlotry “which [comes] from the land of Egypt - m’r¶
mi¶rymâ€.
(37) Cf. the chapter on the political geography presupposed in Rev 13 and Rev
18, in G. BIGUZZI, L’Apocalisse e i suoi enigmi (Brescia 2004) 47-62.
(38) Cf. W. HADORN, Die Offenbarung des Johannes (Leipzig 1928), 139
(“[‘sea’ in Rev 13,1, being contrasted with ‘land’] wohl geographisch zu
verstehen ist und das im Westen befindliche Meer bedeutetâ€); D. GEORGI, “Die
Visionen vom himmlischen Jerusalem in Apok 21 und 22â€, Kirche. Fs G.
Bornkamm (eds. D. LÃœHRMANN ET ALII) (Tübingen 1980) 353 (“seebezogenâ€,
“Welthandelshafenâ€); H. CONZELMANN – A. LINDEMANN, Arbeitsbuch zum Neuen
Testament (Tübingen 199511) 393.