Francesca Stavrakopoulou, «Exploring the Garden of Uzza: Death, Burial and Ideologies of Kingship», Vol. 87 (2006) 1-21
The Garden of Uzza (2 Kgs 21,18.26) is commonly regarded as a pleasure garden
in or near Jerusalem which came to be used as a royal burial ground once the tombs
in the City of David had become full. However, in this article it is argued that the
religious and cultic significance of royal garden burials has been widely
overlooked. In drawing upon comparative evidence from the ancient Near East, it
is proposed that mortuary gardens played an ideological role within perceptions of
Judahite kingship. Biblical texts such as Isa 65,3-4; 66,17 and perhaps 1,29-30 refer
not to goddess worship, but to practices and sacred sites devoted to the royal dead.
8 Francesca Stavrakopoulou
ground away from the temple as an act of cultic purification would have
been wholly ineffectual if the tombs of earlier kings remained in situ (27).
Further weakening the support offered by Ezek 43,7-9 is the alternative
interpretation of these verses as an indication of the central location of the
Garden of Uzza within the palace complex next to the temple, as might be
suggested by wtyb ˆg in 2 Kgs 21,18 (28). In view of these observations, it
thus appears prudent to resist any appeal to Ezek 43,7-9 as evidence in
favour of a relocation of the tombs of the Judahite kings.
Rather than viewing a garden burial as a secondary or alternative
mortuary practice, it is possible that a garden was a most appropriate
location for the interment of monarchs. Indeed, alongside the
references in 2 Kgs 21,18.26 to royal burials in the Garden of Uzza,
the Hebrew Bible offers further glimpses of an association of gardens
with death and burial.
1. Mortuary gardens in the Book of Isaiah
In Isa 65,3-5 a group of worshippers are condemned for their
seemingly illicit cult practices. They are described as:
3. a people who provoke me
to my face continually,
sacrificing in gardens (twng),
and burning incense on bricks,
4. the ones who sit inside the tombs
and spend the night in secluded places (29),
who eat the flesh of pigs,
and the broth of unclean things in their pots (30),
(27) It might be suggested that the bones of all the kings were transferred to
the new burial site, given the use of the formulaic phrase wytba µ[ bkçyw in 2 Kgs
21,18; however, Ezek 43,7-9 presents the temple of Ezekiel’s time as enduring
continued contamination from the µhyklm yrgp.
(28) So D.I. BLOCK, The Book of Ezekiel Chapters 25–48 (NICOT; Grand
Rapids, MI 1998) 584, n. 52; BLOCH-SMITH, Judahite Burial Practices, 119;
GRAY, I & II Kings, 710-711.
(29) An Akkadian cognate occurring in Mesopotamian burial texts describes
the grave as aπar nis≥irti, “the secluded place†(so G. JONKER, The Topography of
Remembrance. The Dead, Tradition and Collective Memory in Mesopotamia
[SHR, 68; Leiden 1995] 194). For an alternative interpretation which reads
µyrwx ˆyb for µé µyrwxnb, see M. DAHOOD, “Textual Problems in Isaiaâ€, CBQ 22
(1960) 400-409. On incubation rites, see T.J. LEWIS, Cults of the Dead in Ancient
Israel and Ugarit (HSM 39; Atlanta, GA 1989) 159-160; S. ACKERMAN, Under
Every Green Tree. Popular Religion in Sixth-Century Judah (HSM 46; Atlanta,
GA 2001) 194-202.
(30) Reading µhylkb, with 1QIsaa, Tg., Vulg.