Francesca Stavrakopoulou, «Exploring the Garden of Uzza: Death, Burial and Ideologies of Kingship», Vol. 87 (2006) 1-21
The Garden of Uzza (2 Kgs 21,18.26) is commonly regarded as a pleasure garden
in or near Jerusalem which came to be used as a royal burial ground once the tombs
in the City of David had become full. However, in this article it is argued that the
religious and cultic significance of royal garden burials has been widely
overlooked. In drawing upon comparative evidence from the ancient Near East, it
is proposed that mortuary gardens played an ideological role within perceptions of
Judahite kingship. Biblical texts such as Isa 65,3-4; 66,17 and perhaps 1,29-30 refer
not to goddess worship, but to practices and sacred sites devoted to the royal dead.
10 Francesca Stavrakopoulou
precise purpose of the activities described in these verses, the view that
they are best understood as rituals within a cult of the dead is probably
correct. This may find further support in the broader context of the
oracle surrounding these verses, in which the motif of ancestors and
descendants is prominent (vv. 7.9). It would thus appear that in 65,3-
4, the gardens are closely associated with tombs and mortuary rites.
Though admittedly this text is not explicit in locating the tombs
precisely within the confines of the gardens, the direct and intentional
association of gardens and tombs is rendered wholly plausible in view
of a further reference to garden cults in 66,17:
Those who sanctify and purify themselves (to go) to the gardens [twng],
following (the) one in the centre, eating the flesh of pigs
and vermin and rodents,
shall come to an end together — oracle of YHWH.
This is also a problematic verse, in which textual difficulties and
interpretative uncertainties render some of the activities described
imperceptible. Yet it portrays the gardens as sacred space in which rituals
elsewhere associated with a cult of the dead are performed. It seems
likely that this text is intended to refer to the same group of worshippers
condemned in 65,3-5: both groups are accused of performing rituals in
gardens, eating pigs’ flesh and other unclean material, and as having a
prominent concern for their sacred status. Moreover, these accusations
employ the same language in referring to the gardens (twng), the
consumption of pigs’ flesh (ryzjh rçb lka), and the consecrated nature of
the worshippers (çdq). Of particular note, however, is the fact that in
66,17, the feasting rituals occurring in the gardens are the same as those
occurring in the tombs in 65,4. This suggests that the association of
gardens and tombs in 65,3-5 is more than coincidental; rather, the tombs
in which the worshippers sit and eat in v. 4 are best understood as being
located within the gardens of the preceding verse.
In both 65,3-5 and 66,17, therefore, it would appear that the twng
under prophetic attack are mortuary gardens, cult places in which
rituals directed at or concerned with the dead are performed. This
contrasts with the more frequent and mistaken interpretation of 66,17
——————
association of Ugaritic mrzh≥ is often discussed in relation to the cultic veneration
of the dead, particularly with reference to Amos 6,7 and Jer 16,5-9; however, this
is all extremely uncertain. See further J.L. MCLAUGHLIN, “The marzeah≥ at Ugarit:
A Textual and Contextual Studyâ€, UF 23 (1991) 265-281; ID., The marzeah≥ in the
Prophetic Literature. References and Allusions in Light of Extra-Biblical
Evidence (VTS 86; Leiden 2001); LEWIS, Cults of the Dead, 80-94.