Francesca Stavrakopoulou, «Exploring the Garden of Uzza: Death, Burial and Ideologies of Kingship», Vol. 87 (2006) 1-21
The Garden of Uzza (2 Kgs 21,18.26) is commonly regarded as a pleasure garden
in or near Jerusalem which came to be used as a royal burial ground once the tombs
in the City of David had become full. However, in this article it is argued that the
religious and cultic significance of royal garden burials has been widely
overlooked. In drawing upon comparative evidence from the ancient Near East, it
is proposed that mortuary gardens played an ideological role within perceptions of
Judahite kingship. Biblical texts such as Isa 65,3-4; 66,17 and perhaps 1,29-30 refer
not to goddess worship, but to practices and sacred sites devoted to the royal dead.
12 Francesca Stavrakopoulou
consider it unlikely that Isa 1,29-30 refers to sexual practices. Firstly,
a sexual connotation of the verb dmj is exceptional, for the majority of
occurrences are found in a variety of non-sexual contexts, including
those in which tree imagery is evident (43). Secondly, the expression
ˆn[r ≈[ lk tjt also occurs in non-sexual contexts, in which it appears
to function in a metaphorical and polemical sense as a conceptual
shorthand signalling religious disobedience (44). As such, the sexual
interpretation of 1,29-30 is unfounded. It is also unlikely that these
verses refer to Asherah worship. Though the frequent rendering of the
term hrça as “grove†in the Septuagint might suggest that trees and
goddesses were interchangeable in the minds of ancient tradents of
biblical traditions (45), not every tree condemned in the Hebrew Bible
should be taken as indicative of the outlawing of Asherah and her cult.
After all, whilst the motif of a sacred tree is certainly well-attested as
a symbol or manifestation of Asherah and other goddesses in the
material culture of Syro-Palestine and its surrounding regions (46), this
motif was not exclusive to goddess cults. Though there is no mention
of tombs, ancestors, or related rituals in these verses, text-critics are
widely agreed that they are closely related in both theme and language
to 65,3-5 and 66,17 (47), in which mortuary gardens and associated cult
practices concerned with or devoted to the dead are criticised.
Accordingly, and in view of the weaknesses of goddess-focused
interpretations, the negative portrayal of trees and gardens in 1,29-30
is better understood as reflecting an Isaian polemic against cultic
mortuary gardens.
(43) E.g., Exod 20,17; Ps 68,17 (ET 16); Job 20,20; Isa 44,9. The verb occurs
in conjunction with tree motifs or tree imagery in Gen 2,9; 3,6; Song 2,3; Isa 53,2.
(44) E.g., 2 Kgs 16,4; 17,10; 2 Chr 28,4; Ezek 6,3; 20,28.
(45) The Mishneh also reflects an understanding of biblical occurrences of
hrça as references to a tree, e.g., ¿Abodah Zareh 3,7.
(46) O. KEEL, Goddesses and Trees, New Moon and Yahweh. Ancient Near
Eastern Art and the Hebrew Bible (JSOTSS 261; Sheffield 1998) 16-57; P. BECK,
“The Tanaach Cult Stands: Iconographic Traditions in Iron I Cult Vesselsâ€, From
Nomadism to Monarchy (eds. N. NA’AMAN – I. FINKELSTEIN) (Jerusalem 1994)
ˇ
417-446; K. JAROS, Die Stellung des Elohisten zur kanaanäischen Religion (OBO
4; Göttingen 1974) 214-217; J.H. STUCKEY, “The Great Goddesses of the Levantâ€,
SSEAJ 29 (2002) 28-57.
(47) See, for example, W.A.M. BEUKEN, “Isaiah Chapters lxv–lxvi: Trito-
Isaiah and the Closure of the Book of Isaiahâ€, Congress Volume, Leuven 1989
(ed. J.A. EMERTON) (VTS 43; Leiden 1991) 204-221; P.A. SMITH, Rhetoric and
Redaction in Trito-Isaiah. The Structure, Growth and Authorship of Isaiah 56–66
(VTS 62; Leiden 1995) 186.