Iwan M. Whiteley, «Cataphora and Lack of Clarity in the Book of Revelation», Vol. 21 (2008) 75-90
This article argues that John adopts a lack of clarity as a strategy for communication in the Book of Revelation. This lack of clarity can be identified in his use of the asyndeton, καί, anarthrous nouns and cataphora. His use of cataphora is investigated in three areas; in Revelation 1, in his use of
ἃ δεῖ γενέσθαι and the colours of the horses. The conclusion is that exegetes should not impose readings on passages in Revelation that are, in themselves, inherently unclear. Instead, they should wait until John clarifies his own ambiguity so that the full rhetorical force of the text can be provided.
79
Cataphora and Lack of Clarity in the Book of Revelation
tellation was referred to because of the lack of article.12 Boring saw Jesus
holding the stars as an anti-astrological sign in that Jesus was in control
of them13. 1 Enoch uses stars to symbolize angels.14 However, if the reader
does not read ahead, but takes John’s words in light of what precedes,
then the stars could refer to the churches, based upon Daniel 12:3 and
the choice of the number seven suggests this. At this stage of reading
the text, the reader has the problem that John has already referred to the
seven lampstands, which also seem (though preferably not) to refer to the
churches. This leads to confusion: are the churches represented as stars
or lampstands or both of them? There also appears to be a conflict in the
imagery, stars shine whereas it is unlikely that the lampstands are shining.
1:20 clarifies the issue, ‘The seven stars are the angels of the seven
churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches’. This verse
acts as the climax of the chapter. Jesus is going to send His angels to the
churches. The one angel in 1:1 has become seven angels to represent their
presence in the churches. They are the stars and the churches are lightless
lampstands that will be ignited by the stars.15 Underlying the text is a
forceful accusation against the churches that they are not living a faithful
life for Jesus, leading to the letters (chapters 2-3) where detail is provided
of their faithlessness. We can see that Revelation 1 builds up ambiguities
with the intention of forceful clarification. The rhetorical force of the text
powerfully brings home to the reader their spiritual position as perceived
by John.
ἃ δεῖ γενέσθαι
The phrase, ‘…what things must take place quickly,’ 1:1 is very frus-
trating. It is unclear due to the absence of a subject for the verb. Both
Beale and Aune recognize that this phrase is important in Revelation
and ‘constitutes the broad outline of the whole book’16. The churches are
intended to ask, ‘what things must soon take place?’ Commentators like
to assist in clarifying what John means. Chilton proposes that the phrase
refers to ‘…the period known in Scripture as “the Last Days,†meaning
the last days of the covenantal nation of Israel, the forty-year “genera-
H. Swete, The Apocalypse of St. John (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1906) 18;
12
R. H. Charles, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St. John vol.1
(Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1979) 30.
M. Boring, Revelation (Louisville: John Knox Press, 1989) 84.
13
1 Enoch 21:3, 81, 86:1-3, 88:1, 90:20-25.
14
For more information, see Whiteley, A Search, 183-4, 197-201.
15
Greg Beale, The Book of Revelation (NIGTC, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999) 1124;
16
Aune’s work (Aune, Revelation, 14) on this is particularly interesting.