Thijs Booij, «Psalm 118 and Form Criticism», Vol. 96 (2015) 351-374
Psalm 118 was recited in the time of Nehemiah. The speaker in the first person singular passages is Israel's representative. The psalm, a communal song of thankfulness, belongs to a group of texts related to Succoth (Psalms 65; 66; 67; 98; 107; 124; 129; Isaiah 12; 25,1-5). These texts, dating from the later post-exilic period, do not constitute a welldelineated literary genre. Psalm 118 and Isaiah 12; 25,1-5, however, constitute a special category. Psalm 118,24 refers to Succoth as the time when YHWH judges the world and decides on the nation's well-being (v. 25) for the year to come.
02_Booij_351_351_374 30/10/15 13:01 Pagina 355
355 PSALM 118 AND FORM CRITICISM 355
In his view, Psalm 66 is in vv. 1-12 mainly hymnic, while Psalm 67 is
a “mixed poem”; Psalms 124 and 129 are considered to be compo-
sitions of a secondary type, using material and forms from individual
laments and songs of thanksgiving 18. Crüsemann’s thoroughly form-
critical discussion of these texts calls for modification.
II. Psalm 118: Date and Function
In Psalm 118 responsive elements and references to other biblical
texts 19 convey the impression that we are dealing with a post-exilic
composition. The latter may also be inferred from the phrase “house
of Aaron” (v. 3), presupposing that all priests are Aaronides. It was
not before Ezra’s time, probably, that the inclusion of priests in the
ranks of the Aaronides was completed 20. Psalms can hardly ever be
dated with any precision; Psalm 118, however, appears to be an
exception. The speaker in vv. 10-12 says that he “warded them (the
nations) off by the name of YHWH” 21. This reminds one of what
Nehemiah and his fellow combatants did to frustrate the plans of their
enemies (Nehemiah 4; 6). The confession in Ps 118,23 that what had
happened was “from YHWH“ recalls Neh 6,16b. As will be explained
later in more detail, the situation in Nehemiah’s time, after the
reconstruction of the wall of Jerusalem, fits the psalm remarkably well.
Psalm 118 is clearly a liturgical text. The call in v. 19 to open
the “gate of YHWH” (v. 20), the blessing in v. 26, and the mention
of the altar in v. 27 presuppose a religious procession leading into
the temple court 22. In view of its form and its content, the psalm
must have been sung in alternating voices. At the beginning (vv. 1-4)
18
See F. CRÜSEMANN, Studien zur Formgeschichte von Hymnus und Dank-
lied in Israel (Neukirchen – Vluyn 1969) 155-209. On Psalm 66, however,
cf. GUNKEL himself, Einleitung, 64. See also C. WESTERMANN, Das Loben
Gottes in den Psalmen (Göttingen 21961) 13.
19
For responses see vv. 1-4, 29. For references see vv. 6 (cf. Ps 56,5.10.12)
and 14, 21, 28 (cf. Exod 15,2).
20
See R. DE VAUX, Les institutions de l’Ancien Testament II (Paris 21967)
263-266.
21
~lyma derived from the verb lwm II. See HALAT (Leiden 31967-1996) 527.
22
Contra F.L. HOSSFELD – E. ZENGER, Psalmen 101-150 (HThKAT;
Freiburg i.B. 2008) 316, who take Psalm 118 as a “poetisch imaginierte
Liturgie”, performable in different situations.