John Van Seters, «Dating the Yahwist’s History: Principles and Perspectives.», Vol. 96 (2015) 1-25
In order to date the Yahwist, understood as the history of Israelite origins in Genesis to Numbers, comparison is made between J and the treatment of the patriarchs and the exodus-wilderness traditions in the pre-exilic prophets and Ezekiel, all of which prove to be earlier than J. By contrast, Second Isaiah reveals a close verbal association with J’s treatments of creation, the Abraham story and the exodus from Egypt. This suggests that they were contemporaries in Babylon in the late exilic period, which is confirmed by clear allusions in both authors to Babylonian sources dealing with the time of Nabonidus.
01_VanSeters_copiaaaa_01_25 28/04/15 11:15 Pagina 16
16 JOHN VAN SETERS
position, so typical of literary works in antiquity 24. The migration,
however, does not begin from Babylon itself but from the more
southern city of Ur, the heartland of the Chaldeans. The larger fam-
ily group of Terah, with his sons and their wives, including Abra-
ham and Sarah, were not Chaldean but Aramean, and they moved
first of all to Harran. It was only subsequent to Terah’s death that
Abraham and his nephew Lot, and their families, migrated in turn
from Harran to Canaan, i.e. Palestine. The rest of Abraham’s
Aramean relatives remained behind in Harran, and the following
patriarchal stories maintain this important Aramean connection to
Harran. Now the reason for dwelling on this migration account is
the striking parallel that it has with another famous Babylonian mi-
gration of the mid-6th century. I refer to the time during the reign of
Nabonidus when he departed from Babylonia and made his sojourn
for several years in Teima in Arabia. This action of Nabonidus has
often been misunderstood and misrepresented both in antiquity, as
in the Book of Daniel (chap. 4, where Nebuchadnezzar is substituted
for Nabonidus), and in modern scholarship. However, the detailed
critical examination of the reign of Nabonidus by Paul-Alain
Beaulieu has given us a much clearer understanding of this period
of history, and this will be our guide for the remarks that follow 25.
3. The Reign of Nabonidus and the Historical Context of the Yahwist
Nabonidus rose to power as king of Babylon in 556 BCE, not as
a member of the royal family or as a native Babylonian or Chaldean,
but as an Aramean whose family roots were probably in the northern
Aramean city of Harran, where his mother was a great devotee and
perhaps a priestess of the god Sîn, and to this god Nabonidus was
also strongly devoted. It was one of the great passions of Nabo-
nidus’s reign to restore the temple of Sîn in Harran, which had been
destroyed by the Medes, and also to restore the ancient ziggurat of
Sîn in Ur, which had lain in ruins for many years. Both of these ob-
jectives were accomplished in the latter part of his reign.
24
VAN SETERS, Prologue to History, 24-42, 86-99.
25
P.-A. BEAULIEU, The Reign of Nabonidus King of Babylon 556-539 B.C.
(New Haven, CT – London 1989).