John Van Seters, «Dating the Yahwist’s History: Principles and Perspectives.», Vol. 96 (2015) 1-25
In order to date the Yahwist, understood as the history of Israelite origins in Genesis to Numbers, comparison is made between J and the treatment of the patriarchs and the exodus-wilderness traditions in the pre-exilic prophets and Ezekiel, all of which prove to be earlier than J. By contrast, Second Isaiah reveals a close verbal association with J’s treatments of creation, the Abraham story and the exodus from Egypt. This suggests that they were contemporaries in Babylon in the late exilic period, which is confirmed by clear allusions in both authors to Babylonian sources dealing with the time of Nabonidus.
01_VanSeters_copiaaaa_01_25 28/04/15 11:15 Pagina 19
DATING THE YAHWIST’S HISTORY: PRINCIPLES AND PERSPECTIVES 19
a major change to the Jacob story was necessary by virtue of J’s
radical modification of the patriarchal tradition in the time of
Nabonidus.
b. Nabonidus’ Influence on the Yahwist
With respect to Cyrus’s rise to power and his relations with
Nabonidus, Beaulieu has called attention to Second Isaiah’s strong
praise of Cyrus in Isa 45,1 in which YHWH is spoken of as having
anointed Cyrus “to subdue nations before him and undo the might
of kings; before whom gates shall be opened and no doors be shut”.
This Beaulieu compares with an inscription referring to events early
in Nabonidus’s reign in which in a dream Marduk reveals to
Nabonidus the eventual overthrow of the Medes and how three
years later Marduk “aroused Cyrus, king of Anshan, his young ser-
vant, who scattered the large (armies) of the Mede with his small
army, and who captured Astyages, king of the Medes, and took him
to his country as captive” 31. Not only is the similarity of the two
texts significant in suggesting some relationship between them, but
it appears also to be highly ironic in that the action of the god Mar-
duk in raising up Cyrus on behalf of Nabonidus is now being used
as a model for the action of YHWH in using Cyrus as his anointed
to overthrow Nabonidus and the Babylonians. Furthermore, it
places Second Isaiah and the Yahwist in the same social and polit-
ical milieu, both very much aware of what was happening around
them and shaping their literary works accordingly.
There are two other features about Nabonidus that may also
have had an influence upon J’s presentation of his history:
1. Nabonidus the historian. One of the distinctive features of
Nabonidus’s reign was his great obsession with the past. This is
reflected in his many restorations of ancient temples throughout
Babylonia, including the ziggurat at Ur, which always began with
a search and recovery of the ancient foundation-tablet containing
the name of the ancient royal builder, sometimes going back to the
third dynasty of Ur, or to even earlier times. In addition to this, in
Leonard Woolley’s excavations at Ur they uncovered a number of
valuable inscribed objects from a range of different periods of time
in the distant past, but all found in the same location, the living
31
BEAULIEU, Nabonidus, 108.