Janelle Peters, «Crowns in 1 Thessalonians, Philippians, and 1 Corinthians», Vol. 96 (2015) 67-84
The image of the crown appears in 1 Thess 2,19, Phil 4,1, and 1 Cor 9,25. However, the crowns differ. While the community constitutes the apostle’s crown in 1 Thessalonians and Philippians, the crown in 1 Corinthians is one of communal contestation. In this paper, I compare the image of the crown in each of the letters. I argue that the crown in 1 Corinthians, available to all believers even at Paul’s expense, is the least hierarchical of the three crowns.
04_Peters_copiaaa_67-84 28/04/15 12:15 Pagina 82
82 JANELLE PETERS
value of the crown in the contested world of the present with the
value of the crown of the eternal world of the future. The bestowal
of crowns by the state and civic bodies implied that the state and
civic bodies had the power to decide who was worthy of deification.
Crowns bestowed by the citizen body and the competitions for its
glory often meant that civic honors were translated into eternal re-
wards. Portraits of the dead often envision the dead wearing a crown,
usually of laurel, which represents the “crown of life” bestowed
upon individuals whose virtues have won for them apotheosis 51.
At the level of Roman imperialism, the state prerogative to crown
is evident in the crown of thorns worn by Jesus. Goodenough trans-
lated the crown placed on Jesus’ head at his execution as a “crown
of acanthus” (Mark 15,17, Matt 27,29, John 19,2-5) to convey a
sense of ironic representation of the immortal athlete 52. Cohen sees
this irony as being related to the kingship attributed to Jesus and
the greater prominence given to royal headdress by the Has-
moneans 53. With either translation, Jesus’ crown of thorns is meant
by the Roman legal apparatus to highlight his dead status and to
subvert the glory of his personal eschatology 54.
Paul’s claim that the individual does not receive a perishable
crown but an imperishable one also critiques the funerary associa-
tions of many pagan athletic competitions. That there is cultural re-
sistance to the state’s claim to have control of the deceased even
after death can be seen in the narrative subversion of the spectacle
in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses or the Golden Ass. For Apuleius’ an-
tagonist-cum-protagonist, Lucius, the crown symbolizes redemp-
tion to humanity and participation in eternal life. Having narrowly
missed being exhibited as part of the spectacle, Lucius has a redemptive
51
F. CUMONT, “Un fragment de sarcophagi judéo-paien”, Revue Archéo-
logique 4 (1916) 1-16.
52
E.R. GOODENOUGH – C. B. WELLES, “The Crown of Acanthus (?)”, HTR
46 (1953) 241-242.
53
S.A. COHEN, The Three Crowns. Structures of Communal Politics in
Early Rabbinic Jewry (Cambridge 1990) 16.
54
The crown of thorns implies athletic victory not for the individual but
for the entire city or society. See A. WEISSENRIEDER, “The Crown of Thorns:
Iconographic Approaches and the New Testament”, Iconography and Biblical
Studies. Proceedings of the Iconography Sessions at the Joint EABS / SBL Con-
ference, 22–26 July 2007, Vienna, Austria (eds. I. DE HULSTER – R. SCHMITT)
(AOAT 361; Münster 2009) 113-138.