E.D. Reymond, «The Wisdom of Words in the Wisdom of Ben Sira», Vol. 95 (2014) 224-246
This article explores the problems posed by language due to its imprecision, the disparity between what one says (or means to say) and what is interpreted. Ben Sira warns his readers of the dangers posed by the changing contexts of an utterance. Sensitivity to context reflects other aspects of Ben Sira's teaching, such as his awareness of people's differing perspectives. In addition, Ben Sira is concerned that his readers be aware of the multiple meanings behind words due to the polysemous nature of the words themselves, their morphology, and/or how they are used.
04_Reymond_224_246 15/07/14 12:18 Pagina 229
THE WISDOM OF WORDS 229
III. The Flexibility of Meaning Based on Context
Ben Sira’s teaching stresses in various ways the importance of
considering other people’s perspectives. Ben Sira writes that one
should not neglect those mourning and should even “mourn with
the mourner” (7,34). He admonishes his audience that they “not
humiliate the one repenting of sin” and then adds “remember we
are all guilty” (8,5). He asks in another passage: “One who has no
mercy for a person like himself, can he ask forgiveness for his
sins?” (28,4; Gr). In the context of a dinner party he advises: “Know
your neighbor like yourself, consider all that you dislike” (31,15;
Ms B). Ben Sira also recognizes that the biases and proclivities that
people bear over mundane affairs are often different. Observing
that people will give advice to suit their own needs (and not that of
the person asking for advice), he writes that one should not consult,
for example, “a coward about battle … a merchant about prices”
(37,11; Ms B). In another passage he notes: “Not everyone (finds)
desirable [lit., good] (the same) pleasure, not everyone chooses the
same thing” (37,28; Ms B and Bm). This view of humanity suggests
that in certain matters some people will never agree. It is not sur-
prising, therefore, that Ben Sira assumes that people interpret cer-
tain utterances in different ways, based on their invested interests
and their biases.
The sycophancy of social inferiors and the general bias against
the poor are revealed in the following passage that treats the inter-
pretation of speech.
!ypwÔhÖm !yr[wkm wyrbdw ~ybr wyrz[w rbdm ryX[
~wqm wl !yaw lykXm rbdw aXw [g [g jwmn ld
w[ygy b[ d[ wlkX taw wtksn lkh rbwd ryX[
whwpdhy ~h ~g lqtn ~aw wrmay hz ym rbwd ld
The rich (person) speaks and his friends are many,
though his words are repugnant, they are considered beautiful.
The poor speaks (read rbdm instead of jwmn) and they utter (read waXy) a rebuke (read hr[g),
though he speaks a wise thing, he (or, it) has no place (among them).
The rich speaks and all are silent,
his insight they lift to the clouds.
The poor speaks (and) they say “Who is this?”
and if he stumbles, they drive him away (13,22-23; Ms A).