Mark Leuchter, «Inter-Levitical Polemics in the late 6th century BCE: The Evidence from Nehemiah 9», Vol. 95 (2014) 269-279
The Levitical prayer in Nehemiah 9 contributes to the gola-ideology running throughout Ezra-Nehemiah, but scholars have generally recognized that its compositional origins are to be connected to the Homeland communities of the exilic or early Persian periods. The present study identifies features in the prayer which suggest that its authors were Levites associated with the Homeland communities and that these authors crafted the prayer in response to the exclusive and elitist ideology of the gola groups. The prayer testifies to tensions within Levite circles well into the Persian period and possibly even beyond.
06_Biblica_AN_Leuchter_269_279 15/07/14 12:22 Pagina 275
275 INTER-LEVITICAL POLEMICS 275
galski has recently made a compelling case that this (among other pieces
of evidence) points to Levite scribes as the redactors of the Book of the
Twelve 33; it would therefore seem that this liturgical formula was strongly
associated with Levite tradition and was infused into the Book of the
Twelve to reinforce that tradition within the Jerusalem temple curriculum
of which the Book of the Twelve eventually became a central feature 34.
Its presence in Neh 9,17 points to a similar circle of Levite tradents stand-
ing behind the prayer in an earlier period.
The second feature strongly suggesting Levite authorship is the manner
in which Israel’s monarchic-era rebellion is characterized later in the prayer:
And they took fortified cities, and a fat land (hnmX), and possessed
houses full of all good things, cisterns hewn out, vineyards, and olive-
yards, and fruit trees in abundance; so they did eat (wlbayw), and were
filled (w[bXyw), and became fat (wnmXyw), and luxuriated in thy great
goodness. Nevertheless they were disobedient, and rebelled against
thee, and cast thy law behind their back [...] (Neh 9,25)
Not only the tenor but the wording of these verses recalls the Song of
Moses, a Levite-composed liturgy which castigates its monarchic-era au-
dience in startlingly similar terms 35:
Curd of kine, and milk of sheep, with fat of lambs, and rams of the breed
of Bashan, and he-goats, with the kidney-fat of wheat; and of the blood
of the grape thou drankest foaming wine. But Jeshurun waxed fat
(!mXyw), and kicked ― thou didst wax fat (tnmX), thou didst grow thick
(tyb[), thou didst become gross (tyXb)! And he forsook God who made
him, and contemned the Rock of his salvation […] (Deut 32,14-15)
The thematic overlap between Neh 9,25 and the Song of Moses are
obvious. Not only is the agrarian imagery typical of old Levitical mytholo-
gy 36, but the threefold litany highlighting the gluttonous consumption of
33
J.D. NOGALSKI, “One Book and Twelve Books: The Nature of the
Redactional Work and Implications of the Cultic Source Material in the Book
of the Twelve”, Two Sides of a Coin. Juxtaposing Views on Interpreting the
Book of the Twelve/Twelve Prophetic Books (eds. E. BEN ZVI – J. D.
NOGALSKI) (Analecta Georgiana 201; Piscataway, NJ 2009) 11-46, here 40-46.
34
The work was already presupposed as such by Ben Sira in the early 2nd
century BCE (Sir 49,10).
35
M. LEUCHTER, “Why is the Song of Moses in the book of Deuteronomy?”,
VT 57 (2007) 295-317, here 314-317.
36
COOK, Social Roots, 78-81; LEUCHTER, Samuel and the Shaping of
Tradition, 28-31.