John Burnight, «Does Eliphaz Really Begin 'Gently'? An Intertextual Reading of Job 4,2-11», Vol. 95 (2014) 347-370
It is widely believed that the Joban poet presents Eliphaz as seeking to reassure Job in his first speech, and only later accuses him of wrongdoing. One prominent exegete, for example, remarks that Eliphaz 'begins considerately, and proceeds with notable gentleness and courtesy' (Terrien). In this paper I propose that Eliphaz’s opening words are neither gentle nor reassuring. Instead, they are a sharp intertextual response to Job’s complaints that he can find no 'rest' (3,26) and that what he 'feared has come upon him' (3,25). In essence, Eliphaz is implying that Job has brought his suffering on himself.
02_Burnight-co_347_370 28/10/14 10:35 Pagina 368
368 JOHN BURNIGHT
Newsom, for example, notes that the destructive wind in 4,9 recalls
the “great wind” that crushed Job’s children (1,19), while Terrien,
among others, suggests that the reference to the “whelps being scat-
tered” in 4,11 may also be a subtle reference to their fate 58.
If, however, the earlier verses in this chapter are sharply critical
of Job (as I have argued above), then Eliphaz’s supposed insensi-
tivity and otherwise peculiar emphasis on the fate of the wicked is
understandable: he considers Job to be among them. Some of the
terminology in 4,9-11 seems, like much of that in 4,1-8, deliberately
targeted at elements of Job’s complaint in 3,20-26. The use of hgav
in 4,10a, for example, creates a distant repetitive parallelism with
3,24, in which Job states that his “roars pour out like water” 59. The
reference to the lion having its “teeth shattered” and “perishing from
a lack of prey (@rj)” also creates a distant semantic parallelism with
3,24, where Job states that his “sighs come in place of his food
(~xl)”. By utilizing imagery that evokes Job’s suffering in his de-
scription of the fate of the wicked, Eliphaz is implying that his mis-
fortune is indeed due to his — and his family’s — own wickedness.
X. Conclusion: Eliphaz’s words in 4,2-11
as a “response” to Job’s complaint
I propose that the first section of Eliphaz’s speech (4,2-11)
serves as a poetic “response” to Job’s complaint in 3,20-26: Eliphaz
recognizes Job’s tacit accusations against God and defends the tra-
ditional Israelite theology of retribution by asserting that God has
inflicted Job’s suffering with cause. In doing so he makes frequent
use of language and imagery that evoke the earlier descriptions of
Job’s plight. The reference to “exhaustion” in 4,2, for example, re-
calls Job’s complaint that he is unable to find “rest” in 3,26. In 4,3-
5 Eliphaz uses imagery that elsewhere in the Bible is used to
describe the “fear” of those experiencing divine punishment, evok-
ing the “fear” imagery in 3,25 (and so implying that Job’s wicked-
ness has caused “what he feared” to occur). Job 4,6 continues this
theme, denouncing not only Job’s “fear” but also his “hope” (i.e.
58
NEWSOM, “Job”, 377; TERRIEN, “Job”, 938. Also see SEOW, Job 1–21, 386.
59
These are, in fact, the only two instances of hgav in Job (though the
verb gavy occurs in Job 37,4).