Paul Foster, «Is Q a 'Jewish Christian' Document?», Vol. 94 (2013) 368-394
Recent research has generated different hypotheses concerning the social location of Q. This discussion commences with an examination of scholarship on the phenomenon of 'Jewish Christianity' and theories concerning the social location of Q. Next, meta-level questions are addressed, concerning how social location is determined from a text. The discussion then considers four areas mentioned in Q that might be of potential significance for determining social location. These are references to synagogues, the law, Gentiles, and unbelieving Israel. In conclusion, the inclusive perspectives may suggest that the document had a more positive attitude toward Gentiles than is often stated.
03_Biblica_Foster_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:56 Pagina 392 03_B
392 PAUL FOSTER
circle of northern Galilean village scribes. Neither of these assump-
tions has gone uncontested, and, perhaps more importantly, they
are themselves highly speculative.
* *
*
Perhaps it need not be stated, but the primary purpose of Q is not
to communicate information about its own social setting 70. Instead
it seeks to transmit those traditions it conveys as being central teach-
ings and pronouncements of Jesus. Furthermore, it seeks to account
for how the rejected figure of Jesus can be claimed as the teacher par
excellence for Q believers. As Tuckett states, this position is defended
by noting that “as a prophetic figure Jesus is thus in a line of conti-
nuity with all the prophets†71. Therefore it is unsurprising that no
clear statement concerning the social location of the community be-
hind Q emerges from the text — that is not the purpose of this type
of document.
Secondly, it is unsurprising that a document that recounts the
teachings of the Jewish figure Jesus reflects Jewish religious beliefs
and controversies. The debate concerning the social location of Q
cannot be determined by requiring the document to be free of Jew-
ish elements in order for it to be understood as open to Gentile con-
verts. In fact if that were the case, Q would have little claim to
preserve authentic Jesus traditions. What is perhaps significant is
that a document which recounts the story of a Jewish teacher, and
may have compiled traditions collected by those who were ethni-
cally Jewish, at a number of points commends the faith of Gentiles
(Q 7.1, 3, 6-9), criticizes Jewish institutions and practices (Q 12.11),
and can also preserve sayings that downgrade the importance of
Torah (Q 16.16, 18), albeit alongside more traditional affirmations
of the law and its requirements (Q 11.42c; 16.17). That such per-
As Fleddermann states, “the author deliberately effaced identifying fea-
70
tures in the service of the author’s aim to present a universal vision of Chris-
tianity rooted in Jesus’ kingdom proclamation. Anyone qualifies as a reader
of Q who wants to hear the message of God’s kingdom proclaimed by Jesus,
and the gospel Q does not disappoint such a readerâ€, FLEDDERMANN, Q: A
Reconstruction and Commentary, 167.
TUCKETT, Q and the History of Early Christianity, 236.
71
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati