Paul Foster, «Is Q a 'Jewish Christian' Document?», Vol. 94 (2013) 368-394
Recent research has generated different hypotheses concerning the social location of Q. This discussion commences with an examination of scholarship on the phenomenon of 'Jewish Christianity' and theories concerning the social location of Q. Next, meta-level questions are addressed, concerning how social location is determined from a text. The discussion then considers four areas mentioned in Q that might be of potential significance for determining social location. These are references to synagogues, the law, Gentiles, and unbelieving Israel. In conclusion, the inclusive perspectives may suggest that the document had a more positive attitude toward Gentiles than is often stated.
03_Biblica_Foster_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:56 Pagina 394
394 PAUL FOSTER
ical banquet. Q is a complex document with competing perspec-
tives which itself may reveal a community that had undergone, and
was still undergoing, a process of transformation in its own under-
standing of the implications of Jesus’ teachings. In the process, tra-
ditional inherited perspectives mellowed and the possibility of
Gentiles sharing the blessings promised by the community’s foun-
dational teacher became a reality. Hence while many Q traditions
may have originated among Jewish Christians, the more inclusive
perspectives of the document and its composition in Greek suggest
that when those traditions were compiled the group held a more in-
clusive and outward looking attitude toward Gentiles.
University of Edinburgh Paul FOSTER
Mound Place
Edinburgh EH1 2LX - UK
SUMMARY
Recent research has generated different hypotheses concerning the so-
cial location of Q. This discussion commences with an examination of
scholarship on the phenomenon of “Jewish Christianity†and theories con-
cerning the social location of Q. Next, meta-level questions are addressed,
concerning how social location is determined from a text. The discussion
then considers four areas mentioned in Q that might be of potential sig-
nificance for determining social location. These are references to syna-
gogues, the law, Gentiles, and unbelieving Israel. In conclusion, the
inclusive perspectives may suggest that the document had a more positive
attitude toward Gentiles than is often stated.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati