Joel S. Baden, «The Continuity of the Non-Priestly Narrative from Genesis to Exodus», Vol. 93 (2012) 161-186
The question of the continuity of the non-priestly narrative from the patriarchs to the exodus has been the center of much debate in recent pentateuchal scholarship. This paper presents as fully as possible, in the space allowed, one side of the argument, namely, that the non-priestly narrative is indeed continuous from Genesis through Exodus. Both methodological and textual arguments are brought in support of this claim, as well as some critiques of the alternative theory.
182 JOEL S. BADEN
the question is whether D is also familiar with elements of the pa-
triarchal narrative. In D’s description of the Israelites’ journey to
the border of Canaan, the Israelites come to the land of Seir, which
D identifies as “the territory of your kinsmen, the descendants of
Esau†(Deut 2,4). Later in the same chapter, the Israelites are for-
bidden from engaging in battle with the Moabites and Ammonites,
because those lands have been assigned to the descendants of Lot
(2,9.19). These identifications of territory with Esau and Lot di-
rectly reflect the patriarchal narratives, in which the relationships
between Israel and these neighboring nations are defined as famil-
ial along precisely these lines.
More pressing are the regular references to the promise to the pa-
triarchs. Recent scholarship has proposed that the references in D to
God’s promise of the land to the “fathers†are not in fact references to
the promise to the patriarchs, but rather to the generation of the exo-
dus. This claim requires, of course, that in those passages in which
the “fathers†are set in apposition with “Abraham, Isaac, and Jacobâ€
the names of the patriarchs be considered secondary additions. Yet
there are a number of passages in D that clearly presume the patriar-
chal narrative in general and the promises to the patriarchs — and ex-
plicitly not to the generation of the exodus — in particular.
Despite the belief that the “fathers†in D represent the genera-
tion of the exodus, in fact the very notion that the generation of ad-
dressees is the second generation to come out of Egypt is a minority
one in D. Only in the opening section of D, Deuteronomy 1–3, is the
view expressed that the generation of the exodus perished in the
wilderness (Deut 1,35; 2,14-15) 19. Elsewhere the text is very clear
that the generation that stood at Horeb is the same generation that is
being addressed by Moses. In Deut 4,10–15 this is stated unequi-
vocally: “The day you stood before the Lord your God at Horeb [...]
you came forward and stood at the foot of the mountain [...] the Lord
The notion of the forty years of wandering is mentioned outside of these
19
chapters, in Deut 8,2.4 and 29,4, but without any connection to punishment
or death of a generation (in fact, Deuteronomy 29 is very clear that it is the
same generation that came out of Egypt, wandered for forty years, and stands
before Moses now). Rather, in these texts the forty years were a period in
which God tested the Israelites who came out of Egypt to determine whether
they were faithful or not, and in which God in turn demonstrated his capacity
for preserving the Israelites in the face of danger.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati