Bradley C. Gregory, «Slips of the Tongue in the Speech Ethics of Ben Sira», Vol. 93 (2012) 321-339
This article examines the references to slips of the tongue in the speech ethics of Ben Sira. Against the background of Proverbs, this characterization of accidental speech errors represents a new development. Its origin can be traced to the confluence between sapiential metaphors for mistakes in life and the idea of a slip of the tongue in the Hellenistic world. Ben Sira’s references to slips of the tongue are generally coordinated with a lack of discipline, though at least two verses seem to suggest that slips are not always sinful and that they represent a universal phenomenon, found even among the wisest sages.
01_Biblica_1_F_Gregory_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:13 Pagina 336
336 BRADLEY C. GREGORY
are not necessarily sinful. They may simply include information
that one would not want to fall into the hands of enemies and that
therefore needs to be carefully guarded 34. However, if this verse is
read in light of the prayer in 22,27–23,6, it could be inferred that
the slip is at least a result of a lack of discipline, if not outright sin.
In comparison with the treatments in Proverbs and 4QSapiential
Work A, what explains this new element of a slip of the tongue? In
surveying other passages on slander and gossip an obvious expla-
nation presents itself: Ben Sira had personal enemies and appar-
ently this was a stinging lesson he had learned from experience. In
the chapter just before this instruction Ben Sira says:
Whoever winks the eye plots mischief
and those who know him will keep their distance.
In your presence his mouth is all sweetness
and he admires your words,
but later he will twist your speech
and with your own words he will trip you up. (27,22-23 NRSV) 35
The situation described here sounds remarkably similar to the
one from which Ben Sira is trying to protect his students in 28,24-
26 and is probably modeled on Prov 6,12-15 36. But then he makes
a telling aside when he comments:
I have hated many things, but him above all
even the Lord hates him (27,24 NRSV)
34
By using the analogies of hedging one’s vineyard and securing one’s
money Ben Sira emphasizes how diligent the student must be in guarding the
lips. Presumably, people then (as today) expend the most effort to protect
their livelihoods.
35
It is striking how frequently this concern occurs in Sirach. Note these
verses: “Do not let the insolent bring you to your feet, or they may lie in ambush
against your words†(8,11 NRSV); “An enemy speaks sweetly with his lips,
but in his heart he plans to throw you into a pit; an enemy may have tears in his
eyes, but if he finds an opportunity he will never have enough of your blood.
If evil comes upon you, you will find him there ahead of you; pretending to
help, he will trip you up†(12,16-17 NRSV). Also note 6,7-13 and 13,12-13.
36
J.T. SANDERS, Ben Sira and Demotic Wisdom (SBLMS 28; Chico, CA
1983) 33-34. The similarity of this statement to Theognis 93-96 is noted by
T. MIDDENDORP, Die Stellung Jesu Ben Siras zwischen Judentum und Hel-
lenismus (Leiden 1973) 21-22. Sanders argues that Ben Sira’s reworking of
Proverbs 6 has conflated it with the statements found in Theognis.