Bradley C. Gregory, «Slips of the Tongue in the Speech Ethics of Ben Sira», Vol. 93 (2012) 321-339
This article examines the references to slips of the tongue in the speech ethics of Ben Sira. Against the background of Proverbs, this characterization of accidental speech errors represents a new development. Its origin can be traced to the confluence between sapiential metaphors for mistakes in life and the idea of a slip of the tongue in the Hellenistic world. Ben Sira’s references to slips of the tongue are generally coordinated with a lack of discipline, though at least two verses seem to suggest that slips are not always sinful and that they represent a universal phenomenon, found even among the wisest sages.
01_Biblica_1_F_Gregory_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:13 Pagina 333
333
SLIPS OF THE TONGUE IN THE SPEECH ETHICS OF BEN SIRA
ishment is for six months (1QS 7.2-3) 26. These respective punish-
ments imply that such a slip is culpable, but less so 27.
Thus, here Ben Sira addresses the possibility that someone has
said something which requires reproof. Ben Sira advises his stu-
dents that it is possible that the person in question has said some-
thing that is culpable and foolish, but that it may well have been a
slip of the tongue. While slips such as these are still culpable, the
logic of the argument suggests that they are less so than intentional
speech sins. As such, the recognition of their universality should
engender empathy when dealing with such a person. Hence, ac-
cording to the following verse, reproving such a person should be
done all the more out of compassion rather than anger.
3. A Slip of the Tongue as Saying Something Contemptible (Sir
23,13-15)
A third place where the idea of a “slip of the tongue†appears is
in the situation described in Sir 23,7-15, a passage in which only v.
11a-b has survived in the Hebrew. In a lesson on controlled speech
to his students Ben Sira asserts that it is sinners and the arrogant who
are overtaken by their own mouths (23,8), while those who submit
themselves to Ben Sira’s instruction will not be “ensnared†by their
lips (23,7). These statements are in substantial continuity with the
outlook in Proverbs (e.g. 12,18). However, later in the lesson Ben
Sira mentions an accidental speech sin, though the specific vocabu-
lary of slipping or stumbling found elsewhere is not present.
Let not your mouth be accustomed to a lack of discipline 28;
for in it is sinful speech.
26
In P inadvertence ([‫ )שגג]ה‬was a mitigating factor generally (Lev 5,18;
Num 15,24-29) and in both P and D there is a distinction between accidental
manslaughter and intentional murder (Num 35,10-16; Deut 4,41-43; 19,1-
13). In 1QS 7.2-3 the sectarians appear to have extended the same kind of
legal reasoning to the realm of speech ethics, analogously to Ben Sira.
27
Another reference to a slip of the tongue in the Dead Sea Scrolls is
found in 4QBeatitudes 14 ii 26-27. Though fragmentary, the context of such
a slip (‫ )מתקל‬connects it with becoming trapped (line 27) and possibly with
“inappropriate words†(line 28).
28
The word “avpaideusi,a†has been translated “a lack of discipline†(cf.
4,25; 21,19.24; LXX Hos 7,16), but the adjective “avsurh,j†(“lewdâ€) has been