C. John Collins, «Noah, Deucalion, and the New Testament», Vol. 93 (2012) 403-426
Jewish authors in the second Temple period, as well as early Christian authors after the New Testament, made apologetically-motivated connections between the biblical story of Noah and Gentile stories of the flood, including Greek stories involving deucalion — most notably Plato’s version. Analysis of the New Testament letters attributed to Peter indicates that these also allude to the Gentile flood stories, likely in order to enhance their readers’ sense of the reality of the biblical events.
05_Biblica_1_H_Collins_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:19 Pagina 425
425
NOAH, DEUCALION, AND THE NEW TESTAMENT
To put it another way, the author of 1 Peter aims to foster Chris-
tian endurance by helping his readers to connect their sense of being
heirs of an ancient great escape to their reception of God’s redemp-
tive activity in Jesus.
Second Peter seems pretty clearly to show a similar aim. In fact, the
context of the first flood allusion (2 Pet 2,4-5) makes the lesson explicit:
If God did all these things recorded in Genesis (2 Pet 2,4-8), “then the
Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trials, and to keep the un-
righteous under punishment until the day of judgment†(v. 9). Likewise
in 2 Peter 3, the same God who made the world and judged it by the
great flood is fully able to bring his final judgment at the appointed time.
The delay is not because God is slow, but — like the delay with the
great flood — is due to God’s merciful wish for people to come to re-
pentance. The author makes his behavioral goal plain when he asks,
“What sort of people ought you to be in lives of holiness and godliness?â€
(2 Pet 3,11). To connect the biblical story with the Gentile stories can
serve to enhance the readers’ feeling for the reality of the ancient events,
and thus to strengthen their resolve for the present and future.
*
*
*
Jewish authors in the Second Temple period, as well as early
Christian authors after the New Testament, made connections be-
tween the biblical story of Noah and Gentile stories of the flood,
including Greek stories involving Deucalion. They did this when
their apologetic purpose called for it, namely to show the actuality
of the biblical events (and sometimes to correct the Gentile ways
of telling the story). A prominent version of the Deucalion story
appears in Plato, and these Jewish and Christian authors show some
familiarity with that version of the story. Indeed, Plato’s use of
terms that resonate with the LXX account, such as “destruc-
tion†and “destroy or corruptâ€, invites the connection.
Although the New Testament authors never make an outright al-
lusion to the Gentile flood stories, they do use wording that allows
a knowledgeable reader to discern an allusion. Evidence from the
textual and historical contexts of these “discerned allusions†in 1
and 2 Peter suggests that the authors intended them. At any rate
they certainly provided a ground for their successors in early Chris-
tianity to go ahead and make the connections explicit.