Sung Jin Park, «A New Historical Reconstruction of the Fall of Samaria», Vol. 93 (2012) 98-106
Most scholars accept the two-conquest model according to which Shalmaneser V conquered Samaria in 723/722 BCE but died shortly thereafter, and that Sargon II then suppressed the ancient city again in his second regnal year (720 BCE) after resolving the internal conflict in Assyria. This paper critically examines this model, discusses some problems regarding chronological order, and proposes a new historical reconstruction in support of one conquest. The probability of there having been propagandistic considerations motivating Sargon II’s scribes is also discussed.
101
A NEW HISTORICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FALL OF SAMARIA
4) The quelling of the conflict by Sargon II (in the winter of 722 BCE)
5) The battle with the Elamites at Der (720 BCE)
6) The battle with the West (720 BCE)
7) The second conquest of Samaria by Sargon II (720 BCE)
The two-conquest model places the internal conflict in Assur before Sar-
gon II’s second ampaign in 720 BCE. However, the Assur Charter, which is
esteemed to be “superior to all other Annalistic sources of Sargon as to his-
torical reliability and exactness of dating†13, describes a different chrono-
logical order. According to this inscription, Sargon II’s campaign in the
Westland took place before the domestic crisis in Assur. Lines 27-28 are
connected sequentially in the Assur Charter (K. 1349).
Translation 14:
16. In my second regnal year when I sat on the throne of kingship and with
the crown of lordship …
17. I defeated the forces of Humbaigash, king of Elam and established his de-
feat …
18. The Hamathite, not the (legitimate) lord of throne, not fitting for the
palace, whose destiny as a shepherd of people …
19. against Assur, his land and his people walked along with evil not good,
and brought …
20. assembled Arpad and Samaria and brought over to his side…
21. … a life not …
22. … in order to conquer Hamath …
23. … I confronted and Assur the god …
24. … accepted my supplication …
25. … directed toward the Westland. Hamath …
26. … an ancient (city?) which had earned fame …
27. … I made the Westland bow down at my feet …
28. I brought to my city Assur and carried due to the utterance …
29. They came to my aid for Assur, city of privilege of ancient dynasty …
30. the exalted cultic center which Assur its lord had chosen as the bond of
the regions of the world …
31. which has been unrivalled since ancient time, whose people had not
known military and civilian corvée. [Shalmaneser,]
32. who does not fear the King of the Universe, brought his hand into that
city for evil …
33. whose people bitterly military and civilian corvée … people as a lower
group …
13
TADMOR, “Campaignsâ€, 36.
14
Contrary to the translation in H.W.F. SAGGS, “The AÅ¡Å¡ur Charterâ€, 14-
15, the present study avoids any possible reconstructions of this severely bro-
ken text.