Edward J. Bridge, «Self-Abasement as an Expression of Thanks in the Hebrew Bible», Vol. 92 (2011) 255-273
Self-abasement is commonly used in the Hebrew Bible to express thanks, especially in narrative texts. Using aspects of politeness theory, it is found that, by using self-abasement, a speaker accepts a loss of face and so avoids indebtedness to the hearer, but at the same time increases the hearer’s face by showing how gracious he was to favourably treat the speaker. It is a form of deference, a use of language that increases social distance between hearer and speaker. However, when self-abasement is also used to express thanks to God, avoidance of indebtedness is not in focus, rather God’s magnanimity. In prayer, self-abasement is also used to motivate God to grant the request.
272 EDWARD J. BRIDGE
God in some fashion. Furthermore, the thanks expressed can be
part of a strategy to motivate God to answer a request.
* *
*
To conclude, the use of self-abasement to express thanks in the
Hebrew Bible highlights both the magnanimity of the one being
thanked yet avoids the one giving the thanks expressing obligation
to the one being thanked. In some cases, the avoidance of ob-
ligation is played upon in the wider narrative. When thanks is
expressed to God, the obligation side of thanks, however, becomes
present. Though the speaker does not expressly obligate himself to
God, the contexts show that he has either already obligated
himself, or will express obligation, to God. Consequently, rather
than being used as avoiding obligation to God, self-abasement
functions simply as an expression of highlighting God’s magna-
nimity. In some cases, such highlighting of God’s magnanimity is
used as a rhetorical strategy to persuade God to answer a request.
It is recognized that the frequency of self-abasement as
expressing thanks in the Hebrew Bible is relatively small, even
though, as noted, self-abasement is a common feature of biblical
language. This may mean that other means of expressing thanks may
be discerned in the biblical texts. For example, in 1 Sam 25,32-35,
David both blesses God and blesses Abigail to God, which allows
him to avoid obligation to her, despite accepting her gift, and there-
fore her request that her husband Nabal and the men of her house-
hold be spared from death for Nabal’s slight of him in vv. 10-11.
This difference between avoiding obligation to people yet
willingness to be obligated to God matches an observation by
Schwartz, who, in a discussion on social relationships as idealised
by Josephus, Ben Sira and the rabbis, argues that the Pentateuchal
laws tend “to ignore or disapprove of such relationships†along
with servitude of one Israelite to another. The only dependency
based relationship “embraced†in the laws is that “between God
and Israel alone†42. It would appear from my study that biblical
narrative is in keeping with the laws. Self-abasement is the mecha-
S. SCHWARTZ, Were the Jews a Mediterranean Society? Reciprocity and
42