Mark Leuchter, «Eisodus as Exodus: The Song of the Sea (Exod 15) Reconsidered.», Vol. 92 (2011) 321-346
This study continues a line of inquiry from the author’s previous essay regarding the 12th century BCE battle traditions embedded in the Song of Deborah (Judg 5) as the basis for a nascent Exodus ideology surfacing in the Song of the Sea (Exod 15). Exod 15 is identified as developing an agrarian ideal into a basis for national identity: Israel’s successful struggles against competing Canaanite military forces echoing earlier Egyptian imperial hegemony is liturgized into a myth where YHWH defeats the Egyptian foe and then settles his own sacred agrarian estate.
Biblica_1:Layout 1 21-11-2011 12:59 Pagina 335
335
EISODUS AS EXODUS: THE SONG OF THE SEA
Though somewhat more abstracted from historical context, this
bears close similarity to the images within Judg 5 regarding the equa-
tion of Canaanite charioteers with the menace of Egyptian hege-
mony 55. Like Judg 5,2-5, YHWH’s warrior traits are contrasted
against the threat of Egypt, but here the typology is extended: the
smaller culture (Canaan) is fully subsumed within the larger (Egypt),
and YHWH confronts the enemy directly. The poet continues to ab-
stract the pseudo-mythic imagery of Judg 5 through the transforma-
tion of the Kishon river (Judg 5,21) into the primordial Sea (My),
invoking the traditional enemy of the Canaanite divine warrior
drama, Sea/Yamm 56. But despite the full engagement of mythic lan-
guage and typologies, Exod 15 maintains distinctions between Is-
raelite and Canaanite usages of these tropes. The poet invokes the
term My as an alloform of the primordial waters of chaos that appear
later in the poem (tmht in v. 5), but in Canaanite myth, the divine
warrior does battle against these watery entities. In Exod 15, the
enemy in question is not Sea/Yamm, but Egypt 57. Indeed, the poet
reinforces this distinction through the repetition of this pivotal mo-
ment several times between vv. 4-10: the captains of Egypt are
drowned in the Sea (v. 4) 58, the deep covers the enemy and they sink
beneath it (v. 5), and even when the rhetoric of battle against the Sea
appears to surface (My blb tmht w)pq…Mym wmr(n Kyp) in v. 8), it
is ultimately revealed to be a prelude to My functioning as an instru-
ment of YHWH’s might against the true enemy (My wmsk Kxwrb in v.
10) 59.
55
LEUCHTER, “Canaanite Chariotsâ€, 267-268.
56
C. KLOOS, Yhwh’s Combat with the Sea. A Canaanite Tradition in An-
cient Israelite Religion (Leiden 1986) 127-157.
57
See the related discussion by KLOOS, Yhwh’s Combat, 142-145; CROSS,
CMHE, 131-132.
58
The full phrase Pws Myb seems to tie the event to a specific location (the
Sea of Reeds) in a manner similar to the reference to the Kishon in Judg
5,21. B.F. BATTO, “The Reed Sea: Requiescat in Paceâ€, JBL 102 (1983) 27-
35, suggests repointing the text to read PwIOs Myb, i.e., “the final seaâ€. However,
if the poem is establishing an Egyptian typology for Canaanite enemies, then
an association with an Egyptian border locale such as the Sea of Reeds is
consistent with the poem’s mythopoeic thrust; see S.C. RUSSELL, Images of
Egypt, 130, n. 19.
59
Compare the repetitions in vv. 4-5 to those involving Yael’s dispatching
of Sisera in Judg 5,24-27. The rhetorical function of extending the event is
substantially the same, and for similar purposes, i.e., associating a particular